White House: Obama Would Veto Keystone Pipeline Bill

White House press secretary Josh Earnest speaks to reporters during the daily news briefing at the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2014. Earnest opened his briefing by taking a question on the shooting in... White House press secretary Josh Earnest speaks to reporters during the daily news briefing at the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2014. Earnest opened his briefing by taking a question on the shooting in Afghanistan which killed a two-star American general and wounded appoximately 15 people including German brigadier general. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Barack Obama would veto legislation authorizing the Keystone XL pipeline that the new Republican Congress is expected to introduced, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest reiterated Tuesday.

As Politico reported Monday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell plans to take up the pipeline bill as one of the first orders of business for his new GOP majority.

“This piece of legislation is not altogether different than legislation that was introduced in the last Congress,” Earnest told reporters Tuesday, “and you’ll recall that we put out a statement of administration position indicating that the president would have vetoed that bill had it passed the previous Congress.”

“I can confirm for you that if this bill passes this Congress, the president wouldn’t sign it either,” he continued.

Earnest explained that the process for determining the pipeline’s impact and route had not yet reached a “final conclusion.”

Latest Livewire
19
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for dweb dweb says:

    Good to know…at least for now. With the price of oil in free fall, would the backers still want to push ahead
    with the project? The costs of extraction and processing just to get something that can be moved via the pipeline
    are higher than many other means. Would be super karma if Congress managed to expend capital to push it past a veto, only to have the whole thing collapse because the economics don’t work.

  2. That’s not super karma - it’s just a typical outcome for a conservative ‘solution’.

  3. Avatar for ottis ottis says:

    Yes but the GOP don’t need to look at the practical nature of a project. Does it benefit their benefactors is the important object.

  4. There was an article yesterday on the website politicususa.com that said Democrats are hoping to add amendments to the Keystone bill that would make it more of a jobs bill, such as requiring that the steel, iron, etc. be American made and sourced, that significant support be granted to renewable energy projects, that the Canadian firm be prohibited from using eminent domain to acquire land needed to site the pipeline, that the oil produced not be exported but sold here domestically, that funding be restored to the energy assistance programs in the original 2009 Stimulus, with priority for seniors and veterans, and some other items that probably would not receive Republican support.
    I haven’t seen this anywhere else, so can’t verify it, but here is the link: http://www.politicususa.com/2015/01/05/keystone-xl-backfires-republicans-democrats-move-turn-pipeline-real-jobs-bill.html

  5. What I want to know is what Senate Democrats would vote to send this to the President and why?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

13 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for ottis Avatar for sooner Avatar for Robman2 Avatar for dweb Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for sniffit Avatar for johnrm Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for nelsonrobison Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for puppies

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: