NYT: Mattis Wanted Congress’ Approval For Syria Strike, But Was Vetoed By Trump

U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis listens to a question during a news conference at Camp Lemonnier in Ambouli, Djibouti April 23, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
AMBOULI, DJIBOUTI - APRIL 23: U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis listens to a question during a news conference at Camp Lemonnier on April 23, 2017 in Ambouli, Djibouti. Mattis is on a regional tour of the Middle E... AMBOULI, DJIBOUTI - APRIL 23: U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis listens to a question during a news conference at Camp Lemonnier on April 23, 2017 in Ambouli, Djibouti. Mattis is on a regional tour of the Middle East. (Photo by Jonathan Ernst-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Department of Defense Secretary James Mattis attempted to get approval from Congress for the Friday strike on Syria in retaliation for its suspected use of chemical weapons against its own citizens, but was vetoed by President Donald Trump, The New York Times reported.

According to military and administration officials who spoke with the Times, Trump wanted to take swift action to back up his tweets earlier in the week, vowing to use “nice and new and smart!” missiles to strike Syria. Military officials warned Trump that if the U.S. was too hostile, an attack could start a larger conflict with Russia. So, the attack on Friday — strikes on three targets related to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s chemical weapons program — was a compromise, according to the Times.

Mattis reportedly pressed for congressional approval because he thinks it’s important to maintain the appearance of public support for military operations.

Mattis reportedly met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Tuesday to discuss the airstrikes, which did not hit any Russian troops nor Syrian military units that are believed to be responsible for the suspected chemical gas attack on a rebel-held town near Damascus earlier this month, according to the Times.

Latest Livewire
35
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Hang in there, Mad Dog. And don’t go native. We need a sane American on the inside.

  2. “Mattis reportedly pressed for congressional approval because he thinks it’s important to maintain the appearance of public support for military operations.”

    When you know there’s not likely to be overwhelming real support, at least try to maintain the appearance of support. That’s how you make general, I guess.

  3. I wonder if he phrased it that way himself.

  4. Article I Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the sole power “to declare war.”

    This is just more evidence that the Constitution does not matter anymore except for the NRA’s interpretation of the Second Amendment.

  5. Too bad modern media will collapse in the fiery exchange, or historians studying the demise of the nation once called the U.S. would be able to read similar accounts of how Mattis and several other ex-Generals tried to wrestle the football away from Trump before he could access the codes.

    Would be funny if it wasn’t so frighteningly plausible.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

29 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for sysprog Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for progress Avatar for inversion Avatar for dont Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for yeahbutwalter Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for musgrove Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for benthere Avatar for jinnj Avatar for georgeh Avatar for rickjones Avatar for acampbell Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for evave2

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: