North Carolina House Adjourns Without Taking Up Repeal Of Anti-Gay Law

Opponents of House Bill 2 hold signs outside the House chambers gallery as the North Carolina General Assembly convenes for a special session at the Legislative Building in Raleigh, N.C., Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2016. N... Opponents of House Bill 2 hold signs outside the House chambers gallery as the North Carolina General Assembly convenes for a special session at the Legislative Building in Raleigh, N.C., Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2016. North Carolina's Republican legislature is reconvening to see if enough lawmakers are now willing to repeal a 9-month-old law that limited LGBT rights, including where transgender people can use bathrooms in schools and government buildings. (Chris Seward/The News & Observer via AP) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The North Carolina House voted Wednesday to adjourn a special session without having repealed HB2, the controversial anti-gay law that Republican legislators had vowed to repeal in exchange for the city of Charlotte scaling back its own non-discrimination protections.

In the days leading up to Wednesday’s special session, Charlotte city councillors and Republican state legislators had seemingly reached a deal: If Charlotte scaled back its non-discrimination ordinance, Republican majorities in both chambers of the state legislature would repeal HB2. Among many other things, the law requires transgender individuals to use bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with the gender assigned to them at birth.

However, early on Wednesday, the deal appeared to be crumbling. After Republicans grumbled that Charlotte had only repealed part of its non-discrimination ordinance, leaving in place protections for transgender contractors among other provisions, the Charlotte City Council met again to repeal that language as well.

When the city council first repealed the measure on Monday, it had passed only on the condition that the state legislature repeal HB2 by Dec. 31—but when the council met again Wednesday, it repealed the entire ordinance without imposing such a trigger.

Later in the day, state Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger filed legislation that would repeal HB2 but also put in place a six-month “cooling period” that would prohibit any local ordinances regulating employment protections or public accommodations.

Democratic senators, whose votes would have been necessary to pass that legislation, were furious.

“This wasn’t the deal,” state Sen. Jeff Jackson, a Charlotte Democrat, said on the Senate floor, according to The Charlotte Observer. “The deal was simple … this bill breaks that deal. Charlotte acted in good faith that we would keep our part of the bargain and it looks like we’re not going to.”

Democrats also expressed concern that the temporary cooling off period would be extended indefinitely by Republicans, who have a veto-proof majority in the state legislature.

As of 6 p.m. ET Wednesday, the state Senate had yet to adjourn.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. It’s who they are. It’s what they do. There’s no making deals with them. Making a deal with them is just a sign of weakness.

  2. Avatar for sooner sooner says:

    In the days leading up to Wednesday’s special session, Charlotte city councilors and Republican state legislators had seemingly reached a deal: If Charlotte scaled back its non-discrimination ordinance, Republican majorities in both chambers of the state legislature would repeal HB2.

    So.

    The Charlotte City Council decided to act in good faith by repealing their ordinance only to see the state legislators renig on their end of the deal. Now that’s what the GOP calls a bargain!!!

    Speaking of bargains hows about some of these fine deals?

    So when will the council put their ordinance back into place?

  3. Avatar for cuwrs cuwrs says:

    What, you’re saying the power-crazed racist bigots in the NC legislature can’t be trusted? Next I suppose you’ll be try to claim that they have different laws when a Dem governor is in office than when a Republican governor is serving. Come on, this is just crazy talk.

  4. When are the Democrats going to learn. They don’t do ANYTHING they say. You can’t trust them on these things. Garland should be nominated - they would have done it already. Single payer should have been passed -= they would have done that to if it was something they wanted. Just like they are going to make changes to health care and Medicare . Come on Democrats. Get some balls!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

70 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for sysprog Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for yskov Avatar for rational Avatar for clearwater Avatar for lastroth Avatar for herringbone Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for nemo Avatar for ken_k Avatar for dickweed Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for johniwaniszek Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for rickjones Avatar for tiowally Avatar for cuwrs Avatar for hechicera Avatar for georgeking

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: