Dem Senator Demands Airstrikes In Syria: ‘We Must Go After ISIS Right Away’

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., questions ousted IRS Chief Steve Miller, former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, J. Russell George, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, testify during a hearing at the Senate... Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., questions ousted IRS Chief Steve Miller, former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, J. Russell George, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, testify during a hearing at the Senate Finance Committee on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) practice of targeting applicants for tax-exempt status based on political leanings on Capitol Hill, in Washington, Tuesday, May 21, 2013. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) will soon introduce legislation to authorize President Barack Obama to launch military airstrikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria within Syria, his office announced Tuesday.

Obama has already authorized limited strikes against ISIS within Iraq and will reportedly consider whether to strike the group, which has reportedly killed two American journalists in the last month, in Syria as well. Nelson’s bill would give Obama the upper chamber’s approval for the latter action.

“This will ensure there’s no question that the president has the legal authority he needs to use airstrikes in Syria,” Nelson said in a statement. “Let there be no doubt, we must go after ISIS right away because the U.S. is the only one that can put together a coalition to stop this group that’s intent on barbaric cruelty.”

Nelson’s office said he plans to introduce the legislation as soon as possible once Congress returns from recess next week.

Steven Joel Sotloff, the second U.S. journalist reportedly killed by the group, grew up in Florida, Nelson’s home state, according to NBC News.

Latest Livewire
29
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. ISIL’s actions don’t deserve a response. Especially not a military response that plays right into their narrative of persecution, and would mostly kill innocents anyways.

  2. How much of this is driven by the beheading of American Journalists, horrible as those are, or driven by the fear that trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives were essentially wasted in the Iraq War? I guess a bit of both…

  3. Why do these politicians never stop to ask “And then what?” when they make these bloodthirsty proposals. Any student of military history should know that you don’t go into an armed conflict without knowing what the end game will look like. Bombing people just to see what will happen is not a strategy.

    If anyone in the Cheney administration had bothered to ask “And then what?” and had a realistic answer before deciding to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, we wouldn’t be in this mess now.

  4. Good. I hope the Senate debates this bill.

    I would vote to give this President unlike Bush the authority to do whatever he needed to rid us of this menace.

  5. Whatever strategy the President comes up with may require bombing inside of Syria. Just because he has the authority doesn’t mean he has to use it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for mschumm Avatar for Diogenes67 Avatar for mymy Avatar for trippin Avatar for glblank Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for docb Avatar for callmelefty Avatar for themiddleman Avatar for bigdaddydrj Avatar for pine Avatar for darrtown Avatar for runnerin1 Avatar for ryokyo Avatar for lcelsie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: