GOP Attorneys General Sue Colorado Over Marijuana Legalization

FILE - In this Feb. 7, 2014 file photo, a worker cultivates a special strain of medical marijuana known as Charlotte's Web inside a greenhouse, in a remote spot in the mountains west of Colorado Springs, Colo. Colora... FILE - In this Feb. 7, 2014 file photo, a worker cultivates a special strain of medical marijuana known as Charlotte's Web inside a greenhouse, in a remote spot in the mountains west of Colorado Springs, Colo. Colorado is poised to award more than $8 million for medical marijuana research, a step toward addressing complaints that little is known about pot's medical potential. Among the research projects poised for approval on Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2014, are one for pediatric epilepsy patients, and another for children with brain tumors. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Republican attorneys general in Nebraska and Oklahoma sued neighboring Colorado on Thursday over its recent legalization of marijuana.

The Washington Post reported that Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt and Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning filed their lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear legal disputes between two states under the Constitution.

They argued that Colorado’s legalization law, passed in 2013 and implemented this year, had violated the Constitution’s supremacy clause, the Controlled Substances Act and international treaties that the United States is a signatory to.

“Oklahoma and states surrounding Colorado are being impacted by Colorado’s decision to legalize and promote the commercialization of marijuana which has injured Oklahoma’s ability to enforce our state’s policies against marijuana,” Pruitt said in a statement, per the Post.

The Obama administration has signaled that it is willing to let Colorado and Washington proceed with their experiments in marijuana legalization, and the lawsuit takes a subtle jab at that decision, noting that Congress has not amended the Controlled Substances Act to allow legalization.

“This Court has identified congressional amendment of the CSA as the only legal mechanism by which a State’s legalization of marijuana can avoid the preemptive effect of the CSA. No such amendment has occurred,” the lawsuit says. “The only thing that has changed… seems to be the executive branch’s willingness to sue a state for violating the CSA.”

Under the Constitution, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over, among other things, “controversies between two or more states.” Hence, the case was filed directly with the high court.

Colorado Marijuana Lawsuit

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: