Megyn Kelly Asks If It’s ‘Appropriate’ For Chicago Protester To Stare At Cop

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Fox News host Megyn Kelly on Tuesday night questioned whether a protester in Chicago on Tuesday night should have stared down a police officer, arguing with one of her panelists, radio host Richard Fowler.

Hundreds of Chicagoans took to the streets on Tuesday night to protest the deadly shooting of black 17-year-old Laquan McDonald by a Chicago police officer last year. The video of the shooting was released on Tuesday evening.

During a panel discussion on her show, Kelly interrupted when she saw an image of a man staring at a police officer in Chicago during the protests.

“I just want to jump in as we’re seeing an extraordinary moment. Look what’s happening here,” Kelly said.

Former New York City police Commissioner Bernard Kerik told Kelly, “Listen, you’re going to have guys like this. You know, they want to instigate.”

Richard Fowler jumped in to protest Kerik’s comment and said, “What is he instigating? Bernie, I’m sorry I’ve got to interrupt.”

“But Richard look at him,” Kelly responded. “This is a cop out there accused of doing nothing wrong, trying to keep the peace.”

Fowler said that it was the protester’s First Amendment right.

“This guy is having a silent protest with this police officer,” he said.

“He gets right in his face and stares him down? This cop hasn’t done anything wrong,” Kelly replied.

“You think that’s fine? You have no problem with this?” Kelly later asked Fowler after he maintained that the protester had a right to stare down the officer.

“This is his first amendment right. This biggest problem here is…” Fowler said in response.

“It’s not a question of what his constitutional rights are. It’s a question of what’s appropriate,” Kelly hit back.

Watch the clip via Media Matters:

Latest Livewire
111
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jinnj jinnj says:

    It absolutely sounds like Megyn Kelley is just about to say “Doesn’t he know his place?”

  2. I wish these protestors would do what Megyn Kelly, Sara Palin, Rupert Murdoch’s masseuse and all the blonder, blond and other journalists at Foxy News want them to do.

  3. Avatar for mjv135 mjv135 says:

    Eye contact with the police is the new “hoodie” now I guess?

    WTF is wrong with these people? If you can’t handle being stared at in anger then you have no business being a cop, and if you don’t understand that staring angrily down at a police force that you think wants to kill you is an important part of democracy, then you have no business having a national TV show.

  4. According to the right wing, the only appropriate response for the protestor would be to stare at his shoes and say, “Yes, massa”

  5. Avatar for dswx dswx says:

    Conversely, why does the cop have to stare at the protester? Either person wants to keep aware for their safety but for the cop to stare is to provoke as well. Not that bubble-headed blonde Megyn would think of anything else but that a black person is at fault.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

105 more replies

Participants

Avatar for george_c Avatar for alliebean Avatar for anniew Avatar for jackson_frisell Avatar for jeffgee1 Avatar for sysprog Avatar for cessnadriver Avatar for vonq Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for boscobrown Avatar for inversion Avatar for sniffit Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dickweed Avatar for dnl Avatar for azjude Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for jinnj Avatar for junebug Avatar for eatbees Avatar for vladomatic Avatar for pmaroneyb

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: