Maryland, DC To Sue Trump, Arguing That He’s Violating Emoluments Clause

A logo sign outside of the Trump International Hotel in the Old Post Office building in downtown Washington, D.C., on April 2, 2017. Photo by Kristoffer Tripplaar *** Please Use Credit from Credit Field ***(Sipa via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C. plan on filing a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, claiming that he is violating the Constitution’s Emoluments clause by maintaining ownership of his businesses, the Washington Post reported Sunday night.

The Emoluments clause states that presidents cannot accept payments from foreign governments. Trump already faces a lawsuit from a progressive watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, over profits he makes from foreign governments through his businesses. The Department of Justice on Friday asked a court to dismiss the case, arguing that CREW and the businesses part of that lawsuit do not have standing to sue and that the Emoluments Clause does not apply to the type of profits Trump receives through his businesses.

In the new forthcoming lawsuit, the attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C. will charge that Trump is “deeply enmeshed with a legion of foreign and domestic government actors” by maintaining ownership of his businesses, according to the Washington Post. The attorneys general will seek Trump’s financial records in the lawsuit if a judge allows the case to proceed, per the Washington Post.

It was revealed last week that Trump’s hotel in Washington, D.C. received payments from a lobbying effort tied to the government of Saudi Arabia last year. The Trump Organization said that it will transfer payments from the Saudi Arabian government to the U.S. Treasury Department by the end of the year.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for drwho drwho says:

    The RW media will play this as yet another Dem political ploy, when it is anything but. What will it take for the spineless Repub Congress to act for the country?

  2. Easy question: It will take Trump’s numbers to drop to the low 30s. It’s not as if the GOP has any loyalty to anyone beyond their donors and reelection chances.

  3. Oh, goody. This one should go straight to the Supreme Court:

    US Constitution, Article III, Section 2

    In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction.

  4. Emoluments clause violations? One cross each exit, to the right…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

16 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for asanders91360 Avatar for joelopines Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for mrf Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for darrtown Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for birdford Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for jsrtheta Avatar for drtv Avatar for drwho Avatar for bluefalcon Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for carolson

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: