UPDATE: Friday, Sept. 9, 2015, 2:55 PM ET
While Facebook initially defended the decision, saying it’s difficult to “create a distinction between allowing a photograph of a nude child in one instance and not others,” the site decided to allow users to share the iconic photo, the Guardian reported.
ORIGINAL STORY
The Norwegian prime minister spoke out on Friday to criticize Facebook for deleting a string of posts of an iconic Vietnam War photo, escalating a conflict over the social networking giant’s ruling that the photo violates site rules.
The international incident was kicked off when Facebook told Norwegian writer Tom Egeland to remove a post featuring The Terror of War, a Pulitzer Prize winning photo that shows children, including a naked 9-year-old girl, fleeing a napalm attack in Vietnam with their faces contorted in horror.
As the Guardian reports, Egeland’s post discussed seven photos that “changed the history of warfare,” but the post led him to be suspended from the site. When Norway’s largest paper, Aftenposten, reported on the dust-up, which involved sharing the photo on its own Facebook page, the networking site requested the paper “remove or pixelize” the photo.
“Any photographs of people displaying fully nude genitalia or buttocks, or fully nude female breast, will be removed,” Facebook explained in the warning sent to Aftenposten.
Before the paper could respond to Facebook’s request, the article post was deleted from the paper’s page, according to the Guardian.
Aftenposten then published a front page editorial in the form of an open letter addressed to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. In the letter, Aftenposten editor-in-chief Espen Egil Hansen accused Zuckerberg of “abusing your power” as the “world’s most powerful editor.”
When Prime Minister Erna Solberg wrote a Facebook post in support of the Aftenposten’s stand, which included the photo, she found her post was also deleted.
“It is highly regrettable that Facebook has removed a record of my Facebook page,” Solberg told the newspaper, as translated by Politico. “I hope Facebook will use this opportunity to review its editing policy and takes the responsibility a large company that manages a broad communication platform should take.”
On Friday morning, she also reposted four iconic photos – including the one of “napalm girl” – that were pointedly censored.
This post has been updated.
Wow, a very fine line.
While it is a hugely iconic and relevant photo, keeping it on-line on Facebook could open the door for future kiddy-porn purveyors to post their crap, and claim a precedent.
Gotta go with the FB ruling.
Gated internet communities are a joke and the Zuck has truth issues dating from college…just saying.
As one of the apparently few people on the planet that doesn’t have a Facebook account,
I have no dog in this fight. ;-}
I agree. If I wanted to know what someone ate for breakfast, lunch and dinner every day I would go in the attic, get my Great Aunt’s diary out of a chest and read it.
Speaking of which did anyone read a few of Josh’s skipped over reddit questions yesterday???