Not Everyone Is Happy About The Marines Making 19 Titles Gender-Neutral

U.S. Marines from 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force based Okinawa, Japan, march during the U.S.-South Korea joint military exercises called Ssangyong 2013 as part of their two-month-long Foal Eagle military exercises in... U.S. Marines from 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force based Okinawa, Japan, march during the U.S.-South Korea joint military exercises called Ssangyong 2013 as part of their two-month-long Foal Eagle military exercises in Pohang, south of Seoul, South Korea, Friday, April 26, 2013. (AP Photo/Lee Jin-man) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The U.S. Marine Corps plans to take the word “man” out of 19 of its titles, and some in the military community are not jazzed about the new gender-neutral names for their positions.

The change, first reported Monday by the Marine Corps Times, is being touted as a way to make jobs more inclusionary after women began to take on combat roles this year. Most titles that had the term “man” have been changed to include the word “marine,” including “Reconnaissance Marine” and “Basic infantry Marine,” according the Times.

Many of the more iconic titles, including “rifleman” and “mortarman,” were left unchanged after careful consideration, an anonymous source told the Marine Corps Times. A service-wide announcement was expected to come in the next few days, according to the report.

Still, the Washington Post reported that the shift has ruffled a few feathers in the military community.

“On one hand, the name changes from ‘man’ to ‘person’ or whatever they want to call it doesn’t really matter. They could call mortarmen bakers for all I care,” Sgt. Geoff Heath told the Post. “But on the other, it’s a direct reflection on society’s crybaby political correctness.”

The reaction rippled across social media, too, as Marine veterans aired their grievances or praised the change. The comments section of an unofficial Marine Corps Facebook page, “Terminal Lance,” was particularly active.

“Not really seeing why this matters,” one comment read, according to the Post. “A marine is a marine. If this triggers you well … not really sure what to say honestly. You’d think someone who has seen combat would have more stones.”

“Are they gonna stop calling them Marines next?” another read, according to the Post.

Others sounded off on Twitter:

The author of the Post’s report, a Marine veteran himself, had a sense of humor about the situation:

Latest Livewire
34
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for meri meri says:

    “many of the more iconic titles, including “rifleman” and “mortarman,” were left unchanged”

    OFFS, people. Pick one.

    Leave them all because of tradition or change them all to be more inclusive.

  2. Sgt. Geoff Heath: “But on the other, it’s a direct reflection on society’s crybaby political correctness.”

    Well, someone is certainly being a crybaby about it, Sarge.

  3. Avatar for meri meri says:

    Yes, but now “Cannon Fodderman” will become “Cannon FodderMarine”.

    Inclusion!

  4. “Commandress-in-Chief”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

28 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for jw1 Avatar for meri Avatar for sysprog Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for humpback Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for mrcurmudgeon Avatar for rudesan Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for populuxecowboy Avatar for noamsane Avatar for jinx_tpm Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for labradog Avatar for tomj Avatar for robcat2075 Avatar for wagonmound Avatar for pandastirfry Avatar for jimbo92107 Avatar for hahagoodman

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: