Groups Sue To Stop New Orleans From Removing Confederate Statues

In this Sept. 2, 2015 photo, a statue of P.G.T. Beauregard is seen at the entrance to City Park at Esplanade Ave. in New Orleans. Prominent Confederate monuments long taken for granted on the streets of this Deep Sou... In this Sept. 2, 2015 photo, a statue of P.G.T. Beauregard is seen at the entrance to City Park at Esplanade Ave. in New Orleans. Prominent Confederate monuments long taken for granted on the streets of this Deep South city may be on the verge of coming down and become new examples of a mood taking hold nationwide to erase racially charged symbolism from public view. Beginning the week of Dec. 7, 2015, the City Council will take up the issue of removing four monuments linked to Confederate history. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Hours after the New Orleans City Council and its mayor Mitch Landrieu signed an ordinance last week to remove four Confederate monuments, a coalition of preservation groups as well the Sons of Confederate Veterans sued to block their removal. The federal lawsuit, filed Thursday in New Orleans, said the monuments’ removal violated local law, federal law, the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution, according to the ABA Journal.

“Plaintiffs have a First Amendment right to free expression, free speech and free
association, which they exercise by maintaining and preserving the historic character and nature of the City of New Orleans, including their monuments, and by using the monuments as the location for events commemorating individuals and events critical to the outcome of the Civil War,” the challengers — Monumental Task Committee, Louisiana Landmarks Society, the Foundation for Historical Louisiana and the Beauregard Camp No. 130, a local chapter of the Sons of Confederate Veterans — wrote in the suit.

The mayor’s office confirmed the city would hold-off on removing the monuments as the case proceeds, NOLA.com reported, and an initial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 14.

By a 6-1 vote, the New Orleans City Council approved a measure that would remove statues of Gens. Robert E. Lee and P.G.T. Beauregard, CSA President Jefferson Davis, as well as the city’s Battle of Liberty Place obelisk, which memorializes a failed revolt by the Crescent City White League against the Reconstruction state government, according to 4WWL News. Landrieu had been pushing for the monuments’ removal since the shooting at an African-American church in South Carolina that killed nine church-goers, which prompted states and institutions across the country to reconsider their Confederate monuments.

In addition to Landrieu, U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony R. Foxx and other federal officials were named as defendants in the suit.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for buford buford says:

    Sedition…Treason…Bigotry…the three legs of the Confederate Failures…yet they want to enshrine these beliefs…America the Ugly…

  2. Plaintiffs have a First Amendment right to free expression, free speech and free
    association, which they exercise by maintaining and preserving the historic character and nature of the City of New Orleans, including their monuments, and by using the monuments as the location for events commemorating individuals and events critical to the outcome of the Civil War," the challengers – Monumental Task Committee, Louisiana Landmarks Society, the Foundation for Historical Louisiana and the Beauregard Camp No. 130, a local chapter of the Sons of Confederate Veterans – wrote in the suit.

    By a 6-1 vote, the New Orleans City Council approved a measure that would remove statues of Gens. Robert E. Lee and P.G.T. Beauregard, CSA President Jefferson Davis, as well as the city’s Battle of Liberty Place obelisk, which memorializes a failed revolt by the Crescent City White League against the Reconstruction state government, according to 4WWL News.

    In 1891, the city erected a monument to commemorate and praise the insurrection from the Democratic Party point of view, which at the time was in firm political control of the city and state and was in the process of disenfranchising most blacks. The white marble obelisk was placed at a prominent location on Canal Street. In 1932, the city added an inscription that expressed a white supremacist view.

    In 1974, the rethinking of race relations after the Civil Rights Movement caused the city to add a marker near the monument explaining that the inscription did not express current philosophy. After major construction work on Canal Street in 1989 required that the monument be temporarily removed, it was relocated to a less prominent location and the inscription was altered. In July 2015, New Orleans mayor Mitch Landrieu proposed removing the monument altogether

    “Considering that freedom of speech is at issue with these groups, I wonder if the city building a Ben Butler statue will solve this…”

  3. Avatar for theod theod says:

    No shortage of irony in NOLA. The plaintiffs claim they have a “First Amendment right to free expression, free speech and free association” to monuments celebrating people and a cause that was expressly designed to withhold those same rights from a majority of others (non-whites) in the slave states. Also in terms of “the outcome of the Civil War,” they choose to forget that they lost.

  4. “The mayor’s office confirmed the city would hold-off on removing the monuments as the case proceeds…” And here I thought we had decided not to negotiate with terrorists.

  5. Why can’t the plaintiffs just buy a parcel of land and put all the statues there as a private park? It seems like that would be easier than having to argue that a bunch of statues are part of a streetcar line so they stay on (presumably) public land.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

49 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for fess Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for theod Avatar for gtomkins Avatar for buford Avatar for inversion Avatar for sniffit Avatar for phillydave Avatar for amazedinchicago Avatar for ottnott Avatar for billstewart2013 Avatar for lkharter Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for dancingbear Avatar for dickweed Avatar for hallam Avatar for crewman6 Avatar for deepsouth Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for bplewis24 Avatar for boisdevache

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: