Lamar Smith Lowers Expectations For NOAA Climate Study Probe… For Now

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, questions Attorney General Eric Holder on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 7, 2012, during the committee's oversight hearing on the Justice Depa... House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, questions Attorney General Eric Holder on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 7, 2012, during the committee's oversight hearing on the Justice Department. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) MORE LESS

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the chairman of the House Science Committee, has been pressing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for months to turn over internal communications regarding a climate study, but on Tuesday Smith took a small step backward with his demands, the Washington Post reported.

In a letter to Commerce Secretary Pritzker, Smith said that he would let NOAA prioritize emails from non-scientist officials at the agency regarding the climate study published in June.

“In order to move the Committee’s work forward and to allow for further discussions on issues related to the subpoenaed communications about which the agency and the Committee disagree, the Committee is willing to accommodate NOAA and prioritize communications sent and received by non-scientific personnel,” he wrote in the letter. “However, this prioritization does not alleviate NOAA’s obligation to respond fully to the Committee’s subpoena.”

Smith has been targeting a NOAA study that contradicted earlier research showing that global warming has slowed over the past few years. He has demanded that NOAA turn over internal communications, charging that the agency’s scientists rushed the study to publication, ignored important data, and altered data in an attempt “to get the results they needed to advance this administration’s extreme climate change agenda.”

But NOAA has refused to turn over emails from scientists, citing the importance of the confidentiality of scientists’ discussion of their research. And members of the scientific community have balked at Smith’s probe into the NOAA study.

“I think it’s unconscionable to use this kind of aggressive action for a single study and to go after the scientists and all their communications as a political tactic,” Andrew Rosenberg, the director of the Union of Concerned Scientists’s Center for Science and Democracy, told TPM last week. “This has a chilling effect on science.”

Ciaran Clayton, a spokesperson for NOAA, told TPM that the agency has received Smith’s latest letter, but NOAA has not yet indicated whether it will comply with the chairman’s latest request.

10
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I’m still amazed that the Pubs always seem to put the dumbest members at the head of these committees. I get that some of the most ardent anti-EPA committee heads and members on the Right are also some of the slowest thinkers on the planet. Yet, I’m glad since if they put some of the more intellectual Republicans (yes, it’s a oxymoron but…) in charge, things could be worse for the EPA, its leaders and legions of dedicated scientists.

  2. He’ll budge, you guys.

    All it takes is guts.

  3. Smith: “Just send along the ones where you confess to making stuff up.”

  4. Ha…Ha — You blinked ! ! - - -

  5. How about the Repubs turn over internal communications regarding the Benghazi hearings, the Planned Parenthood hearings or any number of other politically motivated crap they’ve pulled in the past few years…then they can make these demands.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for gulliver Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for humpback Avatar for avattoir Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for explainer Avatar for beef_beal Avatar for dnl Avatar for machoneman

Continue Discussion