Dem Rep. To Sue Over Removal Of Painting Depicting Cops As Animals

In this Jan. 5, 2017, photo, a painting by David Pulphus hangs in a hallway displaying paintings by high school students selected by their member of congress on Capitol Hill in Washington. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif... In this Jan. 5, 2017, photo, a painting by David Pulphus hangs in a hallway displaying paintings by high school students selected by their member of congress on Capitol Hill in Washington. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., has removed a painting that showed a pig in a police uniform, one of hundreds of artworks on display at the Capitol and sponsored by a member of Congress. Joe Kasper, a spokesman forHunter, says the lawmaker unscrewed the artwork from the display and returned it to the office of Missouri Democratic Rep. William Lacy Clay. (AP Photo/Zach Gibson) MORE LESS

Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-MO) said Monday that he will file a federal lawsuit on Tuesday against the architect of the Capitol for removing a painting by former St. Louis student David Pulphus that depicts police officers as animals.

“Seven months after being displayed as part of a public exhibit, a deluge of alternative right media, aided by the unauthorized actions of certain reactionary members of Congress, deprived Mr. Pulphus of his constitutionally guaranteed 1st Amendment Right of Free Expression,” Clay’s office said in a statement to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Clay’s office said he “is seeking an appropriate remedy through this federal litigation and he is proud to defend both the fundamental rights of his constituent and the 1st Amendment,” according to the Post-Dispatch.

Pulphus’ “Untitled #1” won Clay’s Congressional Art Competition. The piece shows a protest against police violence and depicts police officers, as well as one protester, as animals.

In January, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) removed the painting from a wall in the U.S. Capitol, saying it made him “angry.”

Clay attempted to return the painting to its display permanently. However, after Republicans argued that the painting did not meet the competition’s standards, which bars works of art that depict “subjects of contemporary political controversy or a sensationalistic or gruesome nature,” the architect of the Capitol ordered the painting removed.

71
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for nemo nemo says:

    Really dumb to pick a fight over what is a questionable work of art at best.

  2. I’m surprised the Drumpfsters aren’t already looting museums for artwork, sculptures, etc.

    Guess they aren’t as classy as the Nazi’s were…

  3. @maximus Well, this was the plan but Trump lost interest when he found out the National Gallery of Art didn’t have anything on velvet or “naked chicks on hot cars”.

    "Who wants some old painting of naked fat chicks’ was last he was heard to say on the topic.

  4. Our resident art critic! Next you’ll say your kid could do that.

  5. It may be ‘questionable’ but he won the competition and the right to have his art hung. Duncan Hunter Jr. is being a dick…he is ALWAYS a dick…and ‘wants it removed’ even if HE has to do it. That pesky ‘freedom of speech’ goes both ways.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

65 more replies

Participants

Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for sysprog Avatar for dark_hawk_98 Avatar for drriddle Avatar for johnscotus Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for stephen_maturin Avatar for ottnott Avatar for nemo Avatar for twowolves Avatar for mrf Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for wagonmound Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for beattycat Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for jesus_quintana Avatar for birdford Avatar for tiowally Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for bobef Avatar for lmarinaro Avatar for win

Continue Discussion