Progressive Caucus Leader Backs Obama’s Military Action In Iraq

U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison addresses those present at a briefing about the importance of Congress looking upon the sequester with potential grave consequences, Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013, at the U.S. Courthouse in Minneap... U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison addresses those present at a briefing about the importance of Congress looking upon the sequester with potential grave consequences, Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013, at the U.S. Courthouse in Minneapolis, Minn. Ellison, a Democrat, was the lone member of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation who appeared in person and did not send a representative to discuss the impacts of the sequestration in the state's U.S. courts, including possible layoffs and furloughs in 2014. (AP Photo/The Star Tribune, David Joles) MANDATORY CREDIT; ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS OUT; MAGS OUT; TWIN CITIES TV OUT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Keith Ellison, the co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, on Friday backed President Barack Obama’s latest military action in Iraq.

The Minnesota Democrat cautioned that he’s “wary of mission creep” and insisted the military intervention be “limited.” His statement is nevertheless a sign that the liberal wing of the Democratic party, which led the charge in bringing the Iraq war to an end, is standing behind Obama for now.

Ellison provided the following statement to TPM:

“I support the President’s humanitarian response to help the Iraqi Yazidis and Christians who have been ruthlessly attacked by ISIL. The President should also protect American diplomatic and military personal in Irbil. Like many Americans, I am wary of mission creep and the possibility of being further embroiled in a situation that has no military solution; American military intervention in Iraq should be limited in scope and duration. Moreover, American engagement in Iraq should involve the international community – all nations have the responsibility to protect those who cannot protect themselves.

“If military operations in Iraq continue, the President should seek Congressional authorization for further engagement. Just last month the House passed a bill authored by Rep. McGovern, and which I cosponsored, which specifically prevents the President from deploying American armed forces to Iraq without Congressional authorization.”

Latest Livewire
26
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for pine pine says:

    Well congressman I’ve seen a few “experts” on the tube giving their opinions,“should be doing more” pulled out troops to soon"etc,etc.Graham and McCain will no doubt be on the unwatchable Sunday gabfest this week-end.

  2. We need to find out the countries that are funding these evil Sunni terrorists who are attacking innocents. If our allies are funding these rabid pigs, we should impose sanctions on these countries and seize their assets.

  3. Avatar for darcy darcy says:

    Some fucking progressive. So tell me Rep Ellison, which bombs are the humanitarian ones?

  4. There’s a progressive caucus?

  5. McCain’s criticism is that there aren’t more, bigger, bombs and boots on the ground.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

20 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for CuriousOne Avatar for luschnig Avatar for leftflank Avatar for wial Avatar for trippin Avatar for topcat Avatar for freeopinions Avatar for justamarine Avatar for fitley Avatar for darcy Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for pine Avatar for seehowtheyrun Avatar for ronspri Avatar for seedeevee Avatar for whateverdude Avatar for meta

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: