Amash Defends Barbed Victory Speech: We Must Stand Up To ‘Bullying’

Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) cut into his establishment-backed primary opponent during his victory speech.
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) penned an op-ed Thursday in defense of a cutting victory speech he gave last week, writing that he was “standing up to the bullying” when he blasted his losing, establishment-backed primary opponent.

After winning the Republican primary, Amash lit into investment manager Brian Ellis for running a “despicable smear campaign” against him, including running an ad that referred to Amash as “Al-Qaeda’s best friend.” The Grand Rapids Press editorial board panned that victory speech last week, writing that “there was a high road alternative he should have taken to bring the party back together after such a bitter race.”

“I don’t know why my opponent resorted to such tactics. I can only speculate why a former West Michigan congressman endorsed and repeated those attacks,” the congressman wrote in his rebuttal to the editorial board. “I do know that if we want healthier, more civil politics that reflect the values of our community, such over-the-line smears must end.”

Amash wrote that candidates must “start by standing up to the bullying” in order to keep over-the-top negativity out of campaigns.

“Candidates for office are entitled to run tough campaigns against me or anyone else,” he wrote. “But we all can agree that there are lines that should not be crossed, even in politics. I propose that an ethnically tinged charge of supporting terrorists is one of those lines, and accusing a pro-life father of allowing the murder of baby girls is another.”

h/t Mediaite

Latest Livewire
6
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for estamm estamm says:

    “I do know that if we want healthier, more civil politics that reflect
    the values of our community, such over-the-line smears must end.”. He continued: “We must only use such smears against our Democrat opponents, like that Islamist Kenya-born anti-American usurper socialist president-dictator.”

  2. The G.O.P. is the party of mean-spirited, vindictive, punitive policies. Why should their primaries be any different?

  3. Perhaps Rep. Amash is being hypocritical or disingenuous?

    More than a bit?

  4. I can understand why a candidate of Mr Amash’s “calibre” might snub and demean his opponent in the course of a victory speech. But this is hardly “standing up to a bully.” Amash got his fee-fees hurt during a typical political mano a mano between two obligatory GOTP knuckle-draggers and after he won, had to indulge himself with, metaphorically speaking, a stylized penis display; an age old primate tradition. Whatever happened to “if you can’t stand the heat in the kitchen…” or just invoke the newly minted “Obama ritual shoulder brush.”

    Juvenile twaddle from a puerile politician.

  5. Even in victory the repubs are casting themselves as victims.
    Sheesh!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for estamm Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for darrtown Avatar for misterneutron

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: