Reports: DOJ Could Seek CNN Sale Before AT&T-Time Warner Merger

FILE - In this May 26, 2015, file photo, the Time Warner Cable corporate logo is displayed at a company store, in New York. On Monday, April 25, 2016, the Justice Department approved Charter’s bid to buy Time Warner Cable and create another cable giant. Monday’s OK comes with conditions meant to preserve competition from online services. Additional approvals are required, but expected, before the deal closes. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)
FILE - In this May 26, 2015, file photo, the Time Warner Cable corporate logo is displayed at a company store, in New York. Time Warner is taking a 10 percent stake in streaming television service Hulu, announced Wed... FILE - In this May 26, 2015, file photo, the Time Warner Cable corporate logo is displayed at a company store, in New York. Time Warner is taking a 10 percent stake in streaming television service Hulu, announced Wednesday, Aug. 3, 2016. In addition, networks such as TNT, TBS, CNN and Cartoon Network will be available live and on-demand on the live-streaming service that Hulu’s expected to launch next year. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Department of Justice told AT&T that it would need to sell off CNN or offer other concessions in order to have its acquisition of Time Warner approved, according to several reports Wednesday. The reports differed slightly on the details.

The Financial Times first reported the news, citing three unnamed people with direct knowledge of negotiations over the $84.5 billion deal. Its sources said the Justice Department called for the sale of CNN specifically, though it noted that dropping CNN was “just one of the demands” the government had made in order to approve the deal. One unnamed source said CNN’s sale was one of two demands.

President Donald Trump has feuded with CNN since his days as a candidate, calling the network “fake news.”

Politico followed up on the FT report, though its unnamed sources “familiar with the discussions” said only that the DOJ’s expectations of “structural remedies” were being interpreted as an ultimatum to sell off CNN.

The New York Times, citing unnamed people “briefed on the matter,” said that AT&T and Time Warner had been told to sell off Turner Broadcasting, of which CNN is one of several cable channels. Two unnamed sources told the paper that the deal could alternatively go forward if AT&T sold DirecTV, the satellite TV provider it bought in 2015.

On Wednesday, responding to a reported Justice Department claim that he had offered to sell CNN, AT&T’s CEO, Randall Stephenson, refuted the claim and said “throughout this process, I have never offered to sell CNN and have no intention of doing so,” according to CNN’s Brian Stelter and Politico’s Michael Calderone.

“We are in active discussions with the D.O.J.,” AT&T CFO John Stephens told the New York Times earlier Tuesday. “I cannot comment on those discussions. But with those discussions, I can now say that the timing of the closing of the deal is now uncertain.”

In October 2016, AT&T and Time Warner said they had reached a merger deal, marking an especially massive consolidation in a media industry now used to them.

“We think AT&T has tremendous capabilities that we don’t have on our own,” Time Warner’s CEO said at the time, according to the Los Angeles Times. He cited AT&T’s mobile device-driven potential to deliver Time Warner content to its customers. “This is a unique combination.”

Still, the deal needs the Justice Department’s approval.

“It’s all about CNN,” one unnamed source with “direct knowledge” of the negotiations told the Financial Times.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump, who as President has been known to violate traditional barriers between his administration and the Department of Justice, said he was against the merger.

He said his administration “will not approve” the deal “because it’s too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.” White House adviser Kellyanne Conway denied on Sunday that the White House was intervening in the Justice Department’s work on the deal, Politico noted.

Stephenson has said in the past that selling off CNN “doesn’t seem relevant to approving a deal like this.” Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump’s Justice Department was weighing a lawsuit challenging the deal.

This post has been updated.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. “the Justice Department called for the sale of CNN specifically,”

    That’s not fucking suspicious at all…

  2. Looks like an authoritarian attack on the First Amendment by the Preshitident Anusmouth’s family.

  3. Sessions must be elfing out right now. This is so loaded with only bad ways to go, after Twitler set it all up with his CNN bashing. There’s no way to think of CNN without thinking of Trump’s attacks. It’s a huge part of the CNN brand now, and Sessions -with a couple of other uhmmm “problems” on his plate- has to be cringing at even the slightest mention of this deal point.

  4. White House adviser Kellyanne Conway denied on Sunday that the White
    House was intervening in the Justice Department’s work on the deal,
    Politico noted.

    I’m supposed to believe something she said as truthful?

  5. Yeah, peel off CNN and let some Russian Oligarch buy it through some shell company.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

50 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for pac Avatar for vonq Avatar for economides Avatar for voreason Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for lastroth Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for darrtown Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for decay500 Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for dannysgrandma Avatar for aiddon Avatar for msc00 Avatar for outsidertrading618

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: