DHS Chief: ‘I Don’t See Any Big Issue’ If Kushner Tried To Set Up Backchannel

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly pauses while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017, before the House Homeland Security Committee. This is Kelly's first public appearance before lawmak... Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly pauses while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017, before the House Homeland Security Committee. This is Kelly's first public appearance before lawmakers who are sure to press him for details about the Trump administration's contentious rollout of a travel and refugee ban. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly on Sunday said he does not “see any big issue” with reports that senior White House adviser Jared Kushner, who is President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, sought to set up backchannel communications with the Kremlin before Trump’s inauguration.

“I know Jared. He’s a great guy, decent guy. His number one interest, really, is the nation, so you know there’s a lot of different ways to communicate, backchannel, publicly with other countries,” Kelly told Chuck Todd on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

He said Kushner made those efforts “before the government was in place during the transition period, I think, from what I understand.”

“And I think any time you can open lines of communication with anyone, whether they’re good friends or not so good friends, is a smart thing to do,” Kelly said. “I don’t see any big issue here relative to Jared.”

The Washington Post and Reuters reported Friday that Kushner and Russia’s ambassador to the United States discussed setting up a secret communications channel between Trump’s transition team and Moscow.

Kushner suggested setting up the secure backchannel, according to the report, and even proposed using communications equipment in stateside Russian diplomatic facilities.

“Had you ever, in your lifetime of government service, both in the military and outside of it, had you ever used another government’s communications facility though?” Todd asked Kelly. “The idea of sort of going around American communications?”

“Well, no, but I didn’t have to,” Kelly replied. “I mean in my previous life, we wouldn’t do that kind of thing, but you know, politics being what they are — a better way to put it, not politics, but the kind of interaction here in Washington. There’s a lot of ways to communicate with people.”

Latest Livewire
375
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. So why the secrecy? Why the lying about it and failing to report these things as required by law?

    Go cook up some terror threat to divert attention, you worthless sack.

  2. Somewhat OT but…Do Generals get Dental?

  3. Avatar for jtx jtx says:

    Such a crock of BS

  4. Not a big issue except that even under the most generous interpretation of his actions it’s illegal for a private person, which is what Kushner was in 2016, to conduct diplomacy.

  5. Money shot-

    I mean in my previous life, we wouldn’t do that kind of thing, but you know, politics being what they are

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

369 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for feathered_head Avatar for asanders91360 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for turdburgler Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for mantan Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for nova Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for cd Avatar for uk_observer Avatar for rb639 Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for pandastirfry Avatar for 62fender Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: