House Freedom Caucus Members Cool To Paul Ryan’s Initial Pitch

U.S. Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., is seen during a congressional panel at the 2016 Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference, Saturday, Sept. 19, 2015, in Mackinac Island, Mich. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

This post has been updated.

After Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) announced on Tuesday night that he will consider a bid for House speaker as long as a few conditions are met, members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus expressed skepticism about Ryan and his proposals.

Ryan asked that three groups of Republicans, including the House Freedom Caucus, endorse him by Friday in order to ensure that he will run for the top leadership spot. Freedom Caucus members did not dismiss Ryan’s candidacy outright, but members indicated that they will need to speak with Ryan and deliberate before backing him. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), chair of the caucus, told Roll Call that members of the group will need to take a vote.

It seems the biggest obstacle in Ryan’s path to gaining the Freedom Caucus’ support are his proposals about rules changes in the House, specifically changes to the motion to vacate the chair.

Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS) told Roll Call on Tuesday that the motion to vacate the chair, a resolution that allows the House to vote to oust the speaker, is essential.

“How do you get rid of a speaker that has problems?” he asked. “Every organization, except for a dictatorship, has a motion to vacate the chair.”

“Never thought Paul Ryan would come in and say, ‘I want more power than John Boehner has,'” Huelskamp told Roll Call.

On Wednesday morning, Huelskamp indicated that he still supports the Freedom Caucus’ initial choice for speaker, Rep. Daniel Webster (R-FL).

Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) told Roll Call on Tuesday that changes to the motion to vacate the chair is a “non-starter.”

Yet, Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) suggested that a small change might be acceptable.

“Maybe there’s some procedural change he wants that maintains the motion to vacate, but, in any event, it’s a protection for the people,” he told Roll Call.

Members of the House Freedom Caucus will likely meet with Ryan this week.

“I think we need to invite him in and have him expand on what he meant. You know he just gave a short speech,” Labrador told Politico, referencing his concerns about the motion to vacate the chair.

The caucus typically needs a four-fifths majority vote in order to back any position, according to Roll Call.

House speaker John Boehner (R-OH) told Republicans on Wednesday morning that the House Republican conference will hold leadership elections on Oct. 28, and then the full House will vote for speaker on Oct. 29.

Latest Livewire
89
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This is going just swimmingly.

  2. Drowning metaphors would be welcome

  3. Avatar for tao tao says:

    Freedom Caucus: Dude! We set the conditions around here.

    Even their name shouts the opposite of their intentions.

  4. One way to say “No” is to propose impossible conditions. That’s what Ryan has done.

    And honestly, Ryan has none of skillset for this job. None. He will suck at this if he gets it and I suspect he and the Freedom People know that. That’s part of why Ryan boldly told them “No take-backsies,” and why they felt free to counter with a vigorous “Nuh-uh!”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

83 more replies

Participants

Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for alliebean Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for meri Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for docrock Avatar for leftflank Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for pdxer Avatar for sniffit Avatar for whiteboar Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for tao Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for dddinah Avatar for dnl Avatar for benthere Avatar for cincypix Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for pmaroneyb

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: