GOP Poll: Dem Is In Striking Distance In South Dakota Senate Race

FILE - In this Feb. 20, 2014 file photo, Rick Weiland, the sole Democrat running for the seat being vacated by retiring U.S. Sen. Tim Johnson, talks about his candidacy in Sioux Falls, S.D. Heading to the June 3 prim... FILE - In this Feb. 20, 2014 file photo, Rick Weiland, the sole Democrat running for the seat being vacated by retiring U.S. Sen. Tim Johnson, talks about his candidacy in Sioux Falls, S.D. Heading to the June 3 primary, Weiland had about $485,000 in cash on hand offset by campaign debt of nearly $109,000. He raised nearly $204,000. (AP Photo/Dirk Lammers, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

As South Dakota takes its place as possibly the most interesting Senate race in the country, a Republican polling firm has found the Democratic candidate within striking distance.

A Harper Polling survey released Monday found Democratic candidate Rick Weiland (pictured) trailing former Republican Gov. Mike Rounds, 33 percent to 37 percent. The independent candidate, former GOP Sen. Larry Pressler, whom both sides are attacking, takes 23 percent.

Three-way races are notoriously difficult to predict, but recent polling has showed Rounds struggling to pull away in what was thought to be an assured GOP pick-up with Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD) retiring. A SurveyUSA poll from last week put Rounds at 35 percent, followed by Pressler at 32 percent and Weiland at 28 percent.

TPM’s PollTracker average has Rounds at 35 percent, Pressler at 29.3 percent and Weiland at 28 percent.

The Harper Polling poll, conducted Oct. 9 to 11, surveyed 630 likely voters. Its margin of error is 3.9 points.

Latest Livewire
27
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I hope this isn’t just an effort by the GOP to get voters to rally around Rounds.

  2. For those who were wondering, SD has primary runoffs, which apparently are useless as the loser just runs as an independent, but no general election runoff. Plurality wins. Go figure.

  3. Aw, c’mon. A democrat and South Dakota? I know McGovern and Daschle were from there but give me a break. That’s like class getting out of the Palins’ stretch Hummer.

  4. No, it is an example of voters overall dissatisfaction with both political parties. The problem for the Democrats is what do you do? Do you spend money trying to drive votes away from the independent or do you try to drive votes to the independent hoping that he is likely to causes with the Democrats in the Senate if your candidate ends up not winning?

    The movement in the race has not been from Republican to Democrat but from Republican to the Independent. My bet is Rounds has a solid 35-38% vote, so that doesn’t leave any room if both the Democrat and Independent split the anti-Rounds vote.

  5. Is there any effort underway to get the Native American’s to vote for Weiland?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

21 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for mschumm Avatar for pac Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mymy Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for mtsmalls Avatar for maxi2013 Avatar for yvonneofnc Avatar for gr Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for justamarine Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for darrtown

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: