Report: Grimm Charges Will Focus On Health Food Restaurant

Rep. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 9, 2012, calling on Attorney General Eric Holder to appoint an independent counsel to investigate MF Global. (AP ... Rep. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 9, 2012, calling on Attorney General Eric Holder to appoint an independent counsel to investigate MF Global. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Done in by health food?

The New York Times reported Friday that the federal criminal charges soon expected to be brought against Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY) will “focus largely on his conduct in connection with a health food restaurant he owned on the Upper East Side of Manhattan,” according to two people familiar with the case. The charges were expected to include mail fraud and wire fraud, along with obstruction of justice.

Grimm’s attorney confirmed to TPM on Friday that federal prosecutors in New York were preparing to bring charges against the second-term Staten Island congressman, following more than two years of investigation.

According to the Times, the investigation began by looking into Grimm’s fundraising for his 2010 campaign. Two people who helped with his fundraising, Donna Durand and Ofer Biton, have already been hit with federal charges — Durand for funneling $10,000 to the campaign and Biton for lying on immigration documents. But the Times reported Friday that the indictment against Grimm was not expected to include campaign finance charges, or accusations that Grimm had misused his office. At least not yet.

The health food restaurant, named Healthalicious, was located on Second Avenue near 83rd Street, and the company that operated the establishment was affiliated with another company tied to Biton. According to the Times, Healthalicious had problems. In 2012, Healthalicious was ordered to pay nearly $90,000 for not carrying workers’ compensation insurance. Former workers also hired a lawyer who eventually sued the restaurant’s operating company over payment disputes.

In a statement on Friday, Grimm’s attorney said his client asserted “his innocence of any wrongdoing” and would remain in office.

Latest Livewire
15
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Not carrying Workers Comp? Say it ain’t so. Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

  2. “and would remain in office.”
    Not for long Grimster!

  3. Biton for lying on immigration documents

    Illegal immigration? He was prob white so no big deal.

  4. Avatar for msny msny says:

    Holy moly!! I knew that place. Horrifically overpriced! Figures.

  5. “Healthalicious was ordered to pay nearly $90,000 for not carrying workers’ compensation insurance.”

    Amazing, I suppose laws only apply to others. You know - non-republicans.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

9 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fredb Avatar for dv01 Avatar for nick1936 Avatar for trippin Avatar for enon Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for msny Avatar for zakimon Avatar for dnl Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for chicago11

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: