Judiciary Committee Dems Will Soon Get Chance To Whack Grassley Over SCOTUS

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 9, 2016, during the committee's hearing where Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified. Lynch d... Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 9, 2016, during the committee's hearing where Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified. Lynch discussed Apple's stance on encryption, immigration hearings for children, and other topics. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

During a heated exchange with a Democratic senator, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said on Wednesday that the committee will debate on Thursday how Republicans are handling the prospect of President Obama nominating a Supreme Court justice.

Grassley appeared to be anticipating the chance Democrats committee members will get to lay into him at the previously scheduled Thursday meeting.

“If you want to hear a full-blown debate on this issue, I think we’ll probably have one before our committee tomorrow while we’re also considering three of four judges and a piece of legislation as well,” Grassley said during a hearing with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, according to The Hill.

Grassley made the comment after the committee’s ranking member, Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT), brought up Republicans’ decision not to hold hearings on Obama’s nominee to replace the late Supreme Court Antonin Scalia.

“Our hearing today is on the Justice Department, but what looms large is whether this committee will do its job to fairly consider the next nominee to the Supreme Court,” Leahy said during his opening statement, according to the Washington Post. “I hope that we will, for the good of this country and our entire justice system.”

Leahy criticized Republicans for making the decision to block Obama’s nominee at a GOP caucus meeting.

“The Republican members met behind closed doors to unilaterally decide, without any input from this committee, that this committee and the Senate as a whole will refuse to consider any nominee this year,” Leahy said, according to Politico. “It’s a dereliction of our Constitutional duty.”

This comment sparked a response from Grassley.

“I assume that the Democrat members have their caucus to talk about how their members feel about respective issues and I’ve never been invited to a Democrat Caucus and I don’t think that Democrat caucus is open to the public,” Grassley said, according to The Hill. “Tomorrow, I think we’re going to have debate.”

A spokeswoman for the Judiciary Committee confirmed to The Hill that senators will discuss the issue at a business meeting on Thursday when the committee is slated to discuss lower court nominees.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for dswx dswx says:

    Notice Grassley’s use of the word “debate”. That is precisely how the media will frame it so they can go full “false equivalency” on this, Constitution be damned.

  2. Entrenched old rich white men. Nauseating.

  3. Avatar for bkmn bkmn says:

    If they aren’t going to do their job they should be fine if we don’t pay them and their staff.

  4. Like it or not, Obama’s Supreme Court nominees will stalk the Senate chambers to reach out to the GOP Judiciary committee members. That is, until Trump loans them some of his security to body-slam them out of the Capitol :frowning:

  5. It’ll take a couple generations, but one day the nation will be predominately black and brown and have an ever growing influx of immigrants becoming citizens. Commerce and innovation will require the latter of those three, regardless the sentiment of those fighting the trend as it happens. We’re seeing the dying throes of the goddamned imperialistic, racist, war-mongering, xenophobic, homophobic, misogynistic Caucasian nativists. Good riddance.

    As an aside, unfortunately many of the black, brown and immigrant people I reference will be (and currently are) every bit as homophobic and misogynistic as their white predecessors. Some despicable human traits know no ethnic, religious or racial bounds.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for parent55 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mmurdoch Avatar for hobbitdave Avatar for avattoir Avatar for navamske Avatar for trnc Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for maurizio689 Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for dnl Avatar for cincypix Avatar for sidney76 Avatar for bkmn Avatar for caltg Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for canary02 Avatar for mkclpi Avatar for outlier Avatar for abacusdog

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: