GOP Platform Committee Wants Feds To Turn Fed Lands Over To States ASAP

This photo shows part of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge during a media tour in Harney County, Ore., Wednesday, March 23, 2016. There was a six-week-long armed occupation at the refuge. (Dave Killen/The Oregonia... This photo shows part of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge during a media tour in Harney County, Ore., Wednesday, March 23, 2016. There was a six-week-long armed occupation at the refuge. (Dave Killen/The Oregonian via AP) MAGS OUT; TV OUT; NO LOCAL INTERNET; THE MERCURY OUT; WILLAMETTE WEEK OUT; PAMPLIN MEDIA GROUP OUT; MANDATORY CREDIT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In a nail-biting vote Monday, the committee tasked with writing the Republican Party’s 2016 platform voted to include language calling on Congress to return federal lands to the states immediately.

The amendment was so close that instead of being recorded by voice vote, Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) asked members of the platform committee to stand to show their support.

The amendment has new resonance this year after dozens of anti-government protestors took over the Malheur Wildlife Refuge in Oregon in January to protest federal control of lands. Many affiliated with that takeover had argued the federal government had no business managing federal lands. In 2014, a ragtag group of vigilantes (some of whom also participated in the Oregon standoff) went out to assist rancher Cliven Bundy as he sought to defy BLM officials who were rounding up his cattle, which he had illegally been grazing on federal lands.

The issue of how much land the federal government should control has bled into mainstream Republican politics. A 2012 Utah law actually called for the feds to immediately return lands to the state. Nothing has actually happened since the law passed.

The final draft of the GOP’s Party Platform will still have to be voted on at the GOP convention.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: