Celebrating 25 years of publishing for a reason.
TPM's Annual Membership Drive
The Drive for 2.5k
New Members
1
6
2
0
Help us continue building a better kind of media company.

Georgia GOPer Scraps His Proposed Burqa Ban

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Georgia lawmaker has scrapped a bill Thursday that would have barred women from wearing burqas in certain public areas, Fox 5 Atlanta reported.

“After further consideration, I have decided to not pursue HB 3 in the upcoming 2017 legislative session due to the visceral reaction it has created,” Georgia State Rep. Jason Spencer (R-Woodbine) wrote in a statement obtained by the station.

The bill would have expanded current Georgia law, aimed at Ku Klux Klan members, that bans people from wearing masks that hide their identity. The current law bans men from wearing a mask, hood, or other device that hides a portion of the face, and the now scrapped House Bill 3 would have added women to that ban.

Public outrage soon followed the filing of the bill on Tuesday, and Spencer said that the bill would not have survived “political scrutiny.”

“While this bill does not contain language that specifically targets any group, I am mindful of the perception that it has created,” he said in the statement, according to Fox 5. “My objective was to address radical elements that could pose a threat to public safety. However, further consideration dictates that other solutions will need to be considered. In conclusion, anti-masking statutes have been upheld as constitutional (State v Miller, 1990), and HB 3 would withstand legal scrutiny, but not political scrutiny.”

Latest Livewire
20
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Trump Nazis: This should be in constitution.

  2. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    Radical women wearing burqas. You little Nazi wannabe; go fuck yourself.

  3. I think the point is “anti-masking” statues have been aimed at masks and intentional hiding of the face. Not religious garb worn by people of a religion the statute writer doesn’t like.

  4. “While this bill does not contain language that specifically targets any group, I am mindful of the perception that it has created,"

    Of course you are mindful. You wanted to target burkas, and you knew you had to paper your intent over with neutral-appearing language.

  5. “I am mindful of the perception that it has created.”
    Yeah, the perception of you as an ignorant, gleefully hateful and punitive jerk.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

14 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ottnott Avatar for tena Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for lemmitellya Avatar for demyankee Avatar for rickjones Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for tiowally

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: