Fox Panelist: Maybe ‘Say Yes To The Dress’ Fans Shouldn’t Vote

Tucker Carlson slammed a Fox News segment on gun safety, arguing more children die "drowning in their bathtubs" than from gun accidents.

Tucker Carlson, the one lucky male panelist featured Thursday on Fox News’ “Outnumbered,” suggested young women shouldn’t vote if they need a political ad modeled after a popular TLC show to motivate them to go to the polls.

The panel was discussing the College Republican National Committee’s new digital ad campaign “Say Yes To The Candidate,” which was inspired by TLC’s “Say Yes To The Dress.” The first ad in the nearly $1 million campaign compared the Florida gubernatorial candidates to wedding dresses.

Sandra Smith was the lone female panelist to defend the ad for targeting a key demographic that may be undecided about voting.

“It doesn’t matter,” Smith said of the other panelists’ complaints about the ad. “They’re of voting age, and someone needs to target them.”

“I don’t think as a general matter we should be encouraging people who don’t know anything about what they’re voting for to vote, that’s what Democrats do,” Carlson said later. “Republicans shouldn’t follow suit on that. You shouldn’t pander to people.”

“Tell us what the candidates are for, what they’re against,” he added. “Attacks are allowed, I’m all for attack ads. But, you know, you’re targeting people who are watching ‘Say Yes To The Dress?'”

Smith objected to that.

“Why don’t you stop patronizing them and tell them what the campaign’s actually about,” Carlson said after a bit of back-and-forth.

“Maybe they won’t pay attention,” Smith said.

“Maybe they shouldn’t vote,” Carlson said.

86
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for pac pac says:

    Conservatives are always looking for ways to eliminate more voters.

  2. There is a lot of this kind of bullshit being thrown around, this or that kind of person “should not be allowed to vote.”

    The one I keep hearing from Conservofascists is that public employees were somehow never intended to have the vote because we are inherently socialist, or something. As a public college webmaster, just let me say that if anyone tries to take away our right to vote, it won’t be without consequences.

  3. One of the all time greatest examples of projection I have ever witnessed:

    “I don’t think as a general matter we should be encouraging people who don’t know anything about what they’re voting for to vote, that’s what Democrats do,” Carlson said later. “Republicans shouldn’t follow suit on that. You shouldn’t pander to people.”

    Low information old white Fox News viewers, who constantly vote against their own interests, are the bread and butter of the GOP and the people Republicans pander to.

  4. Tucker, if someone (woman OR man) is a Bagger she/he should not vote.

    The difference between myself and an actual Bagger is this: The above represents a preference. Baggers operationalize their preferences with actual obstruction of their opponents voting.

  5. Avatar for hoagie hoagie says:

    But, but, but,… what about the Constitution!!!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

80 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for slbinva Avatar for anniew Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for chammy Avatar for kufpu Avatar for hippocritic Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for sniffit Avatar for dbushik Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for DelrayDame Avatar for atomicfern Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for hoagie Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for footballbat Avatar for cheshirecat

Continue Discussion