The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee said she fully expects to see Donald Trump Jr. back on Capitol Hill for a public hearing at some point to further discuss his meeting with a Russian lawyer last summer.
Trump Jr. met with the Senate Judiciary Committee for four hours last week to discuss his role in arranging a meeting that was proposed by a family friend as a chance to learn damaging information about his father’s presidential-opponent Hillary Clinton. It was presented as being a part of the Russian government’s efforts to aid President Donald Trump’s campaign, according to emails Trump Jr. released himself.
After that meeting, CNN asked Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) if she expected to see Trump Jr. back in the Senate for public testimony.
“I do — come hell or high water,” she told the network.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has been less committed than Feinstein about whether he plans to bring Trump Jr. back for further questioning, CNN reported.
During his interview with judiciary staff last week, Trump Jr. called the meeting with Kremlin-linked individuals a waste of time and he said he took the meeting to see if they had information about Clinton’s “fitness” for office.
He claimed neither he nor anyone he knew colluded with any foreign governments during the campaign.
Both CNN and The Washington Post reported that inside accounts of the testimony revealed that Trump Jr. declined to address some of the most important questions he was asked, like whether his father helped him dictate his response to press inquiries about the meeting.
Both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee have expressed interest in fully vetting Trump Jr. after he released the email chain that led to his meeting with the Russian lawyer last summer.
In those emails the President’s son said he would “love” to meet with the Russians if they were able to produce damaging information on Clinton.
DiFi. Some days you love her. Some days you hate her. There’s never a day when you say “DiFi? Meh, I can take her or leave her.”
Still missing the real story.
After the meeting was arranged but before it occurred, Trump Sr claimed at a rally that in a ‘few days’ he would have some real dirt on Clinton. The circumstantial case is Trump Sr was informed of the meeting and its possible content and the high level source of the info. Someone told Trump …who? Either Jr., Manafort or Kushner. That’s what I would ask Jr in a public testimony. Trump expected a big scoop on Clinton and couldn’t keep his mouth shut.
In a ‘few days’ Trump didn’t have any dirt on Clinton. Clearly Trump knew about the meeting and the expected agenda. This is the story!
No one would be more thrilled than me to hear Trump Jr. plead the fifth on national TV, but it will never happen.
Decades of weak Democratic leadership in Congress have ensured this group of politicians doesn’t have the fortitude to effectively fight the republicans.
Both CNN and The Washington Post reported that inside accounts of the testimony revealed that Trump Jr. declined to address some of the most important questions he was asked, like whether his father helped him dictate his response to press inquiries about the meeting.
Sure won’t be when Butthead is under oath.
If the public hearing is both public and under oath, I might just take a day off and watch…have already stocked up on popcorn in anticipation of when the $hit really starts hitting the fan…