Ethics Panel Defers Probe Into GOPer’s Finances, Signals DOJ Looking Into It

UNITED STATES - DECEMBER 11: Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., participates in the news conference with the Republican members of the California congressional delegation to discuss California water legislation in the Cap... UNITED STATES - DECEMBER 11: Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., participates in the news conference with the Republican members of the California congressional delegation to discuss California water legislation in the Capitol on Friday, Dec. 11, 2015. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House Ethics Committee announced Thursday that it is deferring its investigation into Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), signaling that the Department of Justice may be conducting its own probe into alleged campaign finance violations.

“The Department of Justice has asked the Committee to defer consideration of this matter and the Committee, following precedent, unanimously voted on March 22, 2017, to defer consideration of this matter at this time,” the committee said in a statement.

That deferral signals that the Justice Department may be conducting its own investigation into the allegations.

The House Ethics Committee cited in its statement a referral it received from the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) on Aug. 31, 2016, regarding Hunter.

On Aug. 26, 2016, the OCE ordered the transmission to the committee of a report on allegations that Hunter “converted funds from his congressional campaign committee for personal use.”

“There is substantial reason to believe that Rep. Hunter converted campaign funds to personal use to pay expenses that were not legitimate and verifiable campaign expenditures,” the OCE said. “He may have violated House rules, standards of conduct, and federal law.”

The Department of Justice declined to comment to TPM. Hunter’s office did not immediately respond to TPM’s request for comment.

His attorneys, Elliot S. Berke and Gregory A. Vega, told NBC 7 San Diego, however, that Hunter “maintains that to the extent any mistakes were made they were strictly inadvertent and unintentional.”

“He took corrective action in consultation with the FEC and, ultimately, he and his wife personally repaid the campaign approximately $60,000,” they said in the statement. “Congressman Hunter intends to cooperate fully with the government on this investigation.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for sanni sanni says:

    Ethics and finance issues while in office - seems to run in this family. Dad was a congressman had financially dealings ethics issue (wife ghost employment (or was it a daughter) and some odd municipal land deal) in the early aughts. Never seemed to effect Duncan Hunter (Sr)'s elections - doubt it will do much harm for the Duncan Hunter (the younger.)

  2. Censure this thief!

  3. Honest to God…You can ‘threaten’ to check every Dem on Earth but you will DEFER on Hunter? I guess the days when you cared if you looked like craven monsters is over, right?

  4. Poor fellow. I know the line is blurred when purchasing jewelry - is it personal? Is it a campaign expense? So hard to make the proper call.

    And he seemed to face such challenges over $60,000 worth of items and services.

    Again, poor boy…

  5. If I trusted the Justice Department under Trump, I would applaud this as a good thing.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

15 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for seek Avatar for alcaray Avatar for sysprog Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for epicurus Avatar for dweb Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for nellieh Avatar for clearwater Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for sanni Avatar for esteban Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for keninmn Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for gregangelo Avatar for rmfrank

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: