The Weekly Standard Distorts Elizabeth Warren’s Comment On Israel

FILE - In this March 7, 2013 file photo, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., pauses while questioning a witness at Senate Banking Committee hearing on anti-money laundering on Capitol Hill in Washington. Warren on Friday... FILE - In this March 7, 2013 file photo, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., pauses while questioning a witness at Senate Banking Committee hearing on anti-money laundering on Capitol Hill in Washington. Warren on Friday, Aug. 22, 2014, issued a “formal disavowal” of a newly-formed political organization urging her to run for president in 2016. In a letter to the Federal Election Commission, lawyers for the first-term Massachusetts Democrat stated that Warren “has not, and does not, explicitly or implicitly, authorize, endorse, or otherwise approve” of “Ready For Warren.” (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

With a mere four-word response at an event Monday on the campus of Tufts University, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) found herself accused by a conservative magazine of making a toxic comparison.

The Massachusetts senator fielded a question from Eva Moseley, who expressed concern about the Israeli offensive in Gaza.

“I was also a Holocaust refugee and I’m extremely concerned that Jews don’t do to another people what was done to them,” Moseley said.

“I think that’s fair,” Warren said.

Based on that exchange, The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper had red meat to feed his conservative readership.

As Halper interpreted the response, Warren had deemed it acceptable to compare Israel’s actions to the atrocities committed by the Nazis.

“At an event today at Tufts University in Massachusetts, Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren said it was ‘fair’ when an activist compared Israel’s actions in Gaza to the Holocaust,” wrote Halper, the online editor for the conservative magazine.

The exchange between Warren and Moseley makes it clear that the Weekly Standard’s characterization distorted what was said. But on Tuesday, Halper wasn’t exactly backing down.

“Seriously? In that case, what did she mean when she said, ‘I think that’s fair’?” he told TPM in an email.

To his credit, Halper included the full interaction and video involving the senator and activist in his post.

He also drew attention to Moseley’s signature on an online petition that condemned “Israel’s ongoing massacre in Gaza” and described the offensive as “the latest chapter in more than a century of Zionist colonialism, dispossession, ethnic cleaning, racism, and genocide — including Israel’s very establishment through the uprooting and displacement of over 750,000 Palestinians during the 1947-1948 Nakba.”

When Moseley asked if “the Palestinians have a right to self-defense,” Warren said they do.

“Of course. So, and the answer is yes. The direction we need to be moving is not to more war,” Warren said. “The direction we need to be moving, as I said, I believe we need to move to a two-state solution where both peoples can be secure and safe within their own borders. So, I’m there.”

Warren’s office highlighted that portion of her response in panning Halper’s characterization.

“The Weekly Standard grossly mischaracterized Senator Warren’s response, in which she expressed her strong desire for an end to violence in the region and her support for a negotiated solution that creates safety and security for both Israelis and Palestinians,” Warren’s press secretary Lacey Rose told TPM in an email.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. The Weekly Liar a more accurate name.

  2. “He also drew attention to Moseley’s signature on an online petition that condemned “Israel’s ongoing massacre in Gaza” and described the offensive as “the latest chapter in more than a century of Zionist colonialism, dispossession, ethnic cleaning, racism, and genocide – including Israel’s very establishment through the uprooting and displacement of over 750,000 Palestinians during the 1947-1948 Nakba.””

    Could not have said it better myself.

  3. Shame on Warren for not correcting a Shoah survivor’s Holocaust comparisons. What do you expect from someone who wants to take money from rich people, like the Nazis?

  4. Obviously, this Holocaust refugee is an anti-Semitic, left-wing Holocaust denier. What else could he be?

    Just as obviously, Bill Kristol and his magazine are dedicated to dispassionately telling the truth because, Kristol is such a fine example of a public intellectual.

  5. Because of course they did.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

21 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for harry_truman Avatar for sooner Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for tcinla Avatar for rudesan Avatar for sylhines Avatar for inthegroove Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for rssrai Avatar for watergate_mike1 Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for ottnott Avatar for go2goal Avatar for gotkids Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for seedeevee Avatar for yellowdawgdem Avatar for pdxspurs

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: