Bogus Voter Fraud Panel Asked Texas To Identify Hispanic Voters

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Donald Trump’s defunct voter fraud commission requested that the state of Texas identify voters with Hispanic surnames when providing voter data to the commission.

The news was revealed in a Dec. 19 letter and accompanying records from the General Services Administration (GSA) to Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), published by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, of which McCaskill is ranking member. The commission operated under the purview of the GSA.

The request was first reported Monday by the Washington Post.

The news will add to concerns among voting rights advocates that the short-lived commission was aimed at making it more difficult for certain groups, including racial minorities, to vote.

Among the documents: an invoice from the Texas Secretary of State to Ronald Williams II, then a staffer on the commission. In October, Williams left the commission after being charged with multiple counts of possessing and distributing child pornography. 

“Hispanic surname flagged,” the invoice notes.

The Post reported that Texas maintains a list of voters with Hispanic surnames — based on Census Bureau data — in order to determine if bilingual election notices are necessary, as required by law.

The data request was never fulfilled, the Post noted, due to a lawsuit from voting rights advocates in the state that temporarily stopped the transfer. The paper also noted, based on data published by the Texas Monthly, that one in eight Texas voter data requests from January 2015 and July 2017 included flags for Hispanic surnames.

Source: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

The defunct election integrity commission’s vice chairman, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, professed ignorance to the Post of any such request.

“It’s a complete surprise to me,” Kobach said, adding: “Mr. Williams did not ask any member of the commission whether he should check that box or not, so it certainly wasn’t a committee decision.”

Kobach said the “information does not, did not advance the commission’s inquiry in any way, and this is the first I’ve heard the Texas files included that.”

He said he didn’t know “what sort of data analysis you would do even remotely relevant to it” and that only requesting such data for one state would render it “useless.”

But a White House official who appeared to have knowledge of the request told the Post, in the publication’s words, “that given the option in Texas, the commission asked to identify Hispanic surnames to resolve data discrepancies or confusion caused by the traditional Spanish naming convention that uses the surnames of both parents.”

The unnamed official added: “There was never a request made to flag people based on their ethnicity. […] That was never asked for, nor is that what this [Texas] response is saying, though I can see why some could read it that way.”

J. Christian Adams, a conservative former commission member who’s spent a career attempting to purge voter roles of suspected fraudulent voters, called the story “a tempest in a teapot,” according to the Post.

But Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap, one of four Democrats on the commission when it folded and now a plaintiff in a lawsuit aimed at forcing it to disclose its records, told the Post the request was “shocking.”

“I find it shocking that they would flag voter names by ethnicity or race, to discover what, we don’t know,” he said, adding: “Right now on its face in my view it looks bad, and it looks bad to a lot of people.”

Latest Livewire
28
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Just why would the checklist requesting documents even include a box for Hispanic surnames? Sure reveals the so-called Commission’s motives.

  2. Anyone that’s interrogated folks knows if the defense is “why would I do that” they did it. Texas has a huge Hispanic population, is threatened with demographic shift in their direction and has a Gov and Sec of State that would get off on this crap. Why Texas? If I was Kobach it would be my first pick. I knew there was a reason they wrapped that panel up ( like they couldn’t keep a lid on the shit they were up to ) …we are seeing a bit of it here.

  3. How shocking that many citizens of the State of Texas have Hispanic surnames. I wonder how that happened; more importantly, as @chicago11 asks, why was that important? I think we all know the answer. Kris “KKK” Kobach is a rotten bigot who really, really hates it when people vote for Democrats. He’s a disgusting pimple, just right for the Trump “Administration.”

  4. I don’t think there was a “box”. There was request to flag names with an Hispanic ring and Kobach used the box to defend himself by claiming he didn’t check it. No one did. The data was in a data base and was extracted with one of the hashes being “Hispanic looking name” .

  5. “It’s a complete surprise to me,” Kobach said, adding: “Mr. Williams did not ask any member of the commission whether he should check that box or not, so it certainly wasn’t a committee decision.”

    “But, that all said, his having checked that box checks a lot of boxes for me.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

22 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for jjwhack Avatar for jep07 Avatar for epicurus Avatar for afisher Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for tomanjeri Avatar for lastroth Avatar for monpa Avatar for tena Avatar for chicago11 Avatar for tsp Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for bashful Avatar for drtv Avatar for jwbuho

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: