Even John Yoo Thinks Trump’s Attacks On Trump U Judge Are ‘Disturbing’

FILE - In this June 26, 2008 file photo, John Yoo testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Former Attorney General John Ashcroft and Yoo face the rare prospect of being held personally liable for alleged violations o... FILE - In this June 26, 2008 file photo, John Yoo testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Former Attorney General John Ashcroft and Yoo face the rare prospect of being held personally liable for alleged violations of individuals' rights in the aggressive aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks.(AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Donald Trump’s smear campaign against a federal judge has so troubled the legal community that even the conservative lawyer who authored the George W. Bush administration’s so-called “torture memos” said the presumptive GOP nominee’s behavior is “disturbing.”

“The only two other presidents I can think of who were so hostile to judges on an individual level and to the judiciary as a whole would be Thomas Jefferson and Franklin Roosevelt,” John Yoo, who served in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel during the George W. Bush administration, told the New York Times. He added that those two presidents only challenged the judicial branch in a broad sense.

“[T]hey weren’t doing it because they had cases before those judges as individuals,” Yoo said.

Trump, meanwhile, has said that U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel — the judge president over two lawsuits against his Trump University — is a “Mexican” whose decisions in the case “has to do with I’m very, very strong on the border.”

(Curiel was born in the United States.)

“[Presidents Jefferson and Roosevelt] had legitimate separation-of-powers fights between the presidency and the judiciary,” Yoo said. “Trump is lashing out because he has a lawsuit in a private capacity, which is much more disturbing.”

Other conservative scholars interviewed by the Times said they were alarmed by Trump’s anti-Curiel tirades, as well as his attitude toward the judiciary branch more generally.

“This is how authoritarianism starts, with a president who does not respect the judiciary,” David Post — a former law professor and writer for the conservative-leaning Washington Post blog the Volokh Conspiracy — told the Times, in reference to Trump’s comments about the judge. “You can criticize the judicial system, you can criticize individual cases, you can criticize individual judges. But the president has to be clear that the law is the law and that he enforces the law. That is his constitutional obligation.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. When you’ve lost John Yoo…

  2. Hah! Like that wasn’t everyone else’s first thought. You win!

  3. Maybe they wouldn’t give you sleepless nights if Joe Isuzu waterboarded him.

  4. I really don’t understand why the judge doesn’t haul Trump’s ass in front of him in court and cite him for contempt of court.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

84 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for ignatius_donnelly Avatar for jw1 Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for voreason Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for yskov Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for whiteboar Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for gr Avatar for zrx1100 Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for dnl Avatar for benthere Avatar for cincypix Avatar for pshah Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for meta Avatar for jeffreybruner

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: