FEMA Nominee Withdraws Amid Questions About Falsifying Records

President Donald Trump turns to Vice President Mike Pence as they meet with emergency officials to discuss the hurricane season, Friday, Aug. 4, 2017, at Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) headquarters in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
President Donald Trump turns to Vice President Mike Pence as they meet with emergency officials to discuss the hurricane season, Friday, Aug. 4, 2017, at Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) headquarters in Was... President Donald Trump turns to Vice President Mike Pence as they meet with emergency officials to discuss the hurricane season, Friday, Aug. 4, 2017, at Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) headquarters in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the deputy administrator at FEMA told NBC News on Wednesday that he would withdraw from consideration for the position, after the outlet asked him about a government report that found he falsified records while previously working for the agency.

“Given the distraction this will cause the Agency in a time when they cannot afford to lose focus, I have withdrawn from my nomination,” Daniel Craig told NBC News in an email.

President Donald Trump nominated Craig to the No. 2 spot at the agency in mid-July, but the Senate had yet to confirm Craig to the post.

An investigation conducted by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General found that Craig falsified travel and timekeeping records while he worked awarding FEMA contracts in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, according to NBC News.

The report on that probe is not public, but NBC News obtained a copy.

According to the report, while he was working for the agency Craig looked for work at a firm, The Shaw Group, that had received a FEMA contract. The report found that while Craig claimed on a voucher that an August 2005 trip to Baton Rouge, Louisiana, was for FEMA business, the trip was actually for an interview with The Shaw Group.

Craig told NBC News that the report was the result of “poor” investigating and that some information contained in it was wrong.

Investigators launched the probe to determine whether Craig broke conflict of interest laws by seeking employment at firms bidding for contracts with FEMA, per NBC News. However, the probe did not find there was enough evidence to show Craig broke conflict-of-interest laws, and he was never charged with a crime.

Craig did make an attempt to recuse himself from matters involving Shaw, according to a letter obtained by the Project on Government Oversight. However, that letter came only after he started interviewing for a job at the firm, and after the firm was awarded a contract, per NBC News.

Read the full report here.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. The best people. Uh huh.

  2. Just maybe someone should consider vetting these people. Nah, that involves a functioning administration.

  3. Avatar for theod theod says:

    Daniel Craig? He is pretty good in those true-to-life James Bond films. This must be why Tramp nominated him. Reality stars stick together.

  4. Did he ever caddy for Trump? Seems like vetting enough to me?

  5. Cheer up, Mr. Craig! “Falsifying Records” one of the requirements to get a job at the Heritage Foundation…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for sociosam Avatar for theod Avatar for thebigragu Avatar for arrendis Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for ottnott Avatar for redraleigh Avatar for keninmn Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for twowolves Avatar for junebug Avatar for gajake Avatar for established_1781 Avatar for tsp Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for rickjones Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for tiowally Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for freeulysses Avatar for dannysgrandma Avatar for outsidertrading618

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: