Rolling Stone Asks Columbia Journalism School To Review Gang Rape Story

FILE - In this Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, file photo, University of Virginia students walk to campus past the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Va. Rolling Stone is casting ... FILE - In this Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, file photo, University of Virginia students walk to campus past the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Va. Rolling Stone is casting doubt on the account it published of a young woman who says she was gang-raped at a Phi Kappa Psi fraternity party at the school, saying there now appear to be discrepancies in the student's account. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner announced Monday that the magazine has asked the Columbia Journalism School to conduct an independent review of its disputed magazine story on an alleged gang rape at the University of Virginia.

Here’s Wenner’s statement, via the Huffington Post’s Michael Calderone:

The story, written by Sabrina Rubin Erdely, began to unravel after other news outlets began to raise questions about Erdely’s reporting process.

Once the Washington Post’s own reporting revealed inconsistencies in the account of the alleged rape victim, a UVA student named Jackie, Rolling Stone managing editor Will Dana published an editor’s note stating its trust in Jackie was “misplaced.” He later clarified that the piece’s “failure” lay with the magazine itself, after many accused Rolling Stone of blaming the victim.

Latest Livewire
3
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. RS: Could you guys review this?

    CJS: Sure. Verify your sources. Done!

  2. And yet Columbia has its own rape issues.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for buckguy Avatar for counter_coulter

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: