GOP Senator: There’s ‘No Basis’ For Senate Not To Consider SCOTUS Nom

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, ranking member on the Senate Aging Committee speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2014, during the committee's hearing to examine older Americans and student loan d... Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, ranking member on the Senate Aging Committee speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2014, during the committee's hearing to examine older Americans and student loan debt. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

There is at least one big crack in the Senate GOP’s blockade on considering President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee: Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME).

The Maine moderate has already said that there should be public hearings for the nominee, but on Tuesday she upped her criticisms of GOP leadership’s position that the next president should choose the successor to the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

“That’s a sincere belief, but it’s not one that I hold,” she said on Maine’s Newsradio WGAN, as flagged by ThinkProgress. “The President, whether Republicans like him or not, is our President until next January, until Inauguration Day and it just seemed to me that there was no basis for saying that no matter who the President nominates, we were not going to consider that individual.”

Collins said she did not know how the decision was made for Republicans to take that hardline stance, adding that it was “inappropriate” that “both sides” launched a “political battle” so quickly after Scalia’s death.

Nonetheless, she continued to criticize Republicans’ unprecedented decision not to meet or hold a hearing for the nominee, D.C. Circuit Court Chief Judge Merrick Garland.

Hearings and meetings “are the best way to thoroughly understand a nominee’s views,” Collins said. “Undoubtably, there will be issues that would arise in a hearing that would provide grounds for people who don’t want to vote for Judge Garland or in those who do.”

She also noted that Garland, a moderate who has won praise from politicians across the spectrum, was likely a better deal for Republicans than the hypothetical nominee a President Hillary Clinton would put forward, or even the nominee of a Republican President Donald Trump. She said she was “perplexed” by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) calculus.

“If the next president is a Democrat, then the balance [of the court] could be tipped way further than Judge Garland,” Collins said. “If the nominee is Mr. Trump, and he becomes the next president, who knows who his nominee would be. He’s rather unpredictable.”

Asked if she was catching flak for breaking away from the party line, she said, “Not really.” Collins also said she’d talked to an unnamed Republican colleague who had agreed to meet with Garland.

“He was saying how much better that he felt about going ahead with the meeting because that’s the way the process should work,” she said.

“The leader’s not real happy with me,” Collins also said.

Latest Livewire
68
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Wow, the dam has burst wide open! I am surprised it’s happening so quickly.

    Gosh, I’d love get in a poker game with some of the other leading republiscum Senators. After getting past the stench, they’d try to bluff but then fold like a cheap suit!

    I’d take all their money and laugh all the way out the door!

  2. Yes but there she is blaming both sides. It s not both sides for christ’s sake

  3. Yeah, I’m really hoping this fight drags on for another few months. I’d love to see down ticket GOP Senators get pasted with it in November…

  4. “If we lose the election, Hillary Clinton’s going to pick somebody who I wouldn’t pick. I’m telling every conservative now: don’t expect to lose the election and still get your way.”

    Lindsey Graham

  5. Fuck Collins. She does this every time. A seemingly sincere statement of principle followed by a vote to contradict it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

62 more replies

Participants

Avatar for david_e_brown Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for ealleniii Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for ajileye Avatar for lew Avatar for eda Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for chammy Avatar for dweb Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for honeyboywilson Avatar for dont Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for suicide_arsonist Avatar for dickweed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for beattycat Avatar for meta Avatar for firewing2 Avatar for canary02 Avatar for machoneman Avatar for sickofitall

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: