Clinton: ‘I Would Have Won’ But For Comey, Russia, Voter Suppression

Hillary Clinton speaks during the Children's Health Fund annual benefit, Tuesday, May 23, 2017, in New York. Clinton also received the American Heroes for Children Award. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Hillary Clinton believes she would have won the 2016 election if not for the “unprecedented attacks” by former FBI Director James Comey and Russian hackers.

The former senator, secretary of state and presidential candidate was blunt in interviews for a lengthy New York Magazine profile published Friday.

Clinton didn’t back away from her heavily criticized analysis of the election in early May — that then-FBI Director James Comey’s last-minute intervention in the election swung a critical mass of undecided voters to Donald Trump’s side. “If the election had been on October 27,” she said at the time, “I’d be your president.”

“I would have won had I not been subjected to the unprecedented attacks by Comey and the Russians, aided and abetted by the suppression of the vote, particularly in Wisconsin,” she told New York in the new profile.

Criticism of Wisconsin’s strict voter ID laws has gained steam in recent months after a series of reports on the hundreds of thousands of people in that state who did not have sufficient identification to vote.

Clinton also reflected on the sexism, blatant and not, she faced as by far the most successful female candidate for president in American history.

“Once I moved from serving someone — a man, the president — to seeking that job on my own, I was once again vulnerable to the barrage of innuendo and negativity and attacks that come with the territory of a woman who is striving to go further,” she said, noting that her approval rating had been 69 percent as secretary of state in the Obama administration.

One particularly difficult moment, she recalled, came during the second presidential debate. News outlets noted afterward that Trump had frequently stalked behind Clinton as she walked around a staged town hall floor, answering questions.

“[W]hat he was doing was so … uh …” she began, pausing. “So personally invasive: following me, eyeing me.”

Clinton decided that addressing the situation in the moment — “Get away from me!” — would have delivered Trump a victory.

“I saw him destroy all of his Republican opposition who eventually tried to confront him on a debate stage and he reacted with such contempt. He will gain points, and I will lose points,” she said.

Still, Clinton noted, Trump had won the debate among his most macho fans.

“But I also ended up with him really satisfying a lot of his potential voters. One of these guys, I can’t remember who, said, ‘Oh, he was the alpha male! He was the big gorilla in the …’ — whatever they call gorilla groups!” she said. “I think that for people already committed to him, they loved it.”

New York noted that commentary came from Nigel Farage, the Brexit cheerleader, who compared Trump to a silverback gorilla.

Interestingly, Clinton seemed to confirm former President George W. Bush’s pointed commentary on Trump’s inaugural address, in which the President declared: “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.”

Three unnamed sources told New York in January that Bush remarked afterward: “That was some weird shit.”

Did he say that? the magazine asked Clinton.

“Put it in your article,” she said. “They tried to walk back from it, but…”

Did she hear it herself? New York’s Rebecca Traister asked.

She transcribed Clinton’s response: “She raises her eyebrows and grins.”

Latest Livewire
263
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Coulda, shoulda, woulda. I fully agree with her viewpoint, but what’s done is done.

    We need to ALL work together to stop the ChristoRussianFascist regime taking over this country.

  2. “and welcome to the ‘Goldilocks’ version of the official DNC autopsy. The show will begin after these ‘messages’”

  3. You still here?

  4. She’s right, of course but it serves no purpose making speeches about it. In fact, it reinforces some of the silly rightwing stereotypes of progressives. Better to strike Trump in the throat with a clinched fist and grab him by the balls the next time you see him. That the rightwing understands and respects.

  5. RW scum will always have stereotypes of liberals whether we make speeches about their scumbaggery or not.

    And there’s no way that Dems can move forward and try to rectify the damage done if the the racism, misogyny and RW scumbaggery aren’t acknowledged. It serves no purpose to “let it go.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

257 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for jcs Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for johnbarleycorn Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for darcy Avatar for georgeh Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for edhedh Avatar for black_knight Avatar for woland66 Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for maximus Avatar for lilyinindy Avatar for drwho

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: