Clinton Dismisses Report About Emails Holding Beyond ‘Top Secret’ Intel

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 20 - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during an organizing event, Wednesday, Jan. 20, 2016, in Burlington, Iowa. (Photo By Al Drago/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Wednesday dismissed a new report that she sent “a high level of classified material” over the private email server she used exclusively during her tenure as secretary of state.

Clinton characterized the report as “another leak” in an interview with NPR and added that she “never sent or received any material marked classified, and that hasn’t changed in all of these months.”

The interview followed a Tuesday Fox News report concerning a letter from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III, who said he had identified “several dozen” additional classified emails on Clinton’s server. The report said McCullough’s letter indicated those emails were classified at a level beyond “top secret.”

Clinton argued that the matter was an “interagency dispute” about how to classify certain materials. She told NPR she would leave the issue to the Justice Department.

“I’m just going to leave it up to the professionals at the Justice Department, because nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified,” Clinton told NPR.

The Clinton campaign on Tuesday accused the inspector general of selectively leaking “materials in order to resurface the same allegations and try to hurt Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign,” according to the Associated Press.

Clinton told NPR that the emails in question included an innocuous New York Times article on the then-classified drone program that had been forwarded to her.

“How a New York Times public article that goes around the world could be in any way viewed as classified or the fact that it would be sent to other people off of the New York Times site, I think, is one of the difficulties that people have in understanding what this is about,” she told NPR, repeating that she never sent or received classified information on her private server.

“I did perhaps receive some New York Times articles,” she continued.

Latest Livewire
65
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This also illustrates how insane Classifying stuff has become.

    Look, if it’s in the Friggin’ New York Times and on CNN, it’s not a secret anymore-- you can’t put the genie back in the bottle.

    Continuing to consider that stuff Classified makes a mockery of the Classification system.

  2. Just people doing what they normally do with power - abuse it.

  3. Agreed 100%, but I would also note that numerous people on here would be going ballistic about this if it was a Republican.

    But indeed, this appears to be a non-story. Hillary totally screwed up using a private server, no doubt. It just did not look good. But I have seen zero evidence of any “crime”.

  4. She’s looking fierce, though. Am I right?

  5. I don’t think accusing the inspector general of trying to destroy her is going to come off very well. I’ve been ignoring this pseudo-scandal because it’s such obvious b.s. but Hillary really isn’t handling it well at all.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

59 more replies

Participants

Avatar for cabchi Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for alliebean Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for dv01 Avatar for mollynyc Avatar for avattoir Avatar for chammy Avatar for dswx Avatar for rudesan Avatar for thx1138 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for ralph_novy Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for inversion Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for boidster Avatar for darcy Avatar for beattycat Avatar for sherrybb Avatar for clauscph

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: