Grassley Says No Decision On Whether To Hold Hearing On Obama’s SCOTUS Nom

UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 21: Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, talks with reporters in the Capitol after a vote in the Senate to end the minority’s ability to filibuster and kill most presidential nominations. (Photo ... UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 21: Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, talks with reporters in the Capitol after a vote in the Senate to end the minority’s ability to filibuster and kill most presidential nominations. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Tuesday that he has not decided whether he would hold hearings for President Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away over the weekend.

“I would wait until the nominee is made before I would make any decisions,” Grassley told reporters, according to Radio Iowa. “In other words, take it a step at a time.”

Shortly following Scalia’s death, Republicans in the Senate, including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), said that the next president should nominate Scalia’s successor. Grassley on Saturday said in a statement that “it only makes sense that we defer to the American people who will elect a new president to select the next Supreme Court Justice.”

On Tuesday, Grassley reiterated that he believes the next president should choose Scalia’s replacement.

“This is a very serious position to fill and it should be filled and debated during the campaign and filled by either Hillary Clinton, Senator Sanders or whoever’s nominated by the Republicans,” he said, according to Radio Iowa.

Grassley also mentioned 2007 remarks from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Grassley said he is embracing that “same spirit” now.

“Senator Schumer talked about balance and we had balance: four conservatives, four liberals and one moderate and maintaining the balance for the supreme court is just important now it was in 2007,” Grassley said, according to Radio Iowa.

Schumer on Tuesday pushed back against conservatives who have tried to use his speech to justify an attempt to block Obama’s nominee. The New York senator said comparing 2007 and now is like comparing “apples to oranges.”

Latest Livewire
36
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Do. your. job!

  2. Uh, Chuck? Read your weekend email first. Something from McConnell came in.

  3. Pretty sure we’ve seen this little song and dance from Grassley before. He comes from a blue-leaning state and so he pretends to be open to compromise and then eventually says that Obama’s being unreasonable and there’s nothing he can do but at least he tried.

    Remember the Gang of Six from the ACA negotiations? Classic Grassley. He’ll say no to holding hearings AFTER Obama nominates his hideously partisan and under qualified nominee.

  4. These anti-American thugs have likely heard the blowback from their belligerence. Now they’re thinking the better of their original position. The problem for them is walking that back now will be a tremendous disappointment for their base.

  5. “I would wait until the nominee is made before I would make any decisions,” Grassley told reporters, according to Radio Iowa. “In other words, take it a step at a time.”

    Well, duh! When the time comes, just do your job … one step at a time.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

30 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for alcaray Avatar for yeahwhatever Avatar for humpback Avatar for trippin Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for dswx Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for noamsane Avatar for inversion Avatar for sniffit Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for denisj Avatar for nocoolnamejim Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for jcblues Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for wagonmound Avatar for beattycat Avatar for albesure Avatar for d_major

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: