McDaniel Staffers Look For Voting ‘Irregularities’ At Courthouse Caper Site

This photo taken Feb. 25, 2014 shows Mississippi State Sen. Chris McDaniel, R-Ellisville, right, accompanied by Sen. Michael Watson, R-Pascagoula, speaking in the Senate Chambers in Jackson, Miss. Thad Cochran is en... This photo taken Feb. 25, 2014 shows Mississippi State Sen. Chris McDaniel, R-Ellisville, right, accompanied by Sen. Michael Watson, R-Pascagoula, speaking in the Senate Chambers in Jackson, Miss. Thad Cochran is engaged in his toughest campaign in a generation. The former Appropriations Committee chairman faces a June 3 primary challenge from a two-term state lawmaker. Chris McDaniel riles up tea party voters by denouncing big federal spending and portraying the 76-year-old incumbent as a Washington insider who’s lost touch with folks back home. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Supporters and campaign staff for state Sen. Chris McDaniel (R) sorted through voter books at the Hinds County courthouse on Thursday, looking for “irregularities,” according to Mississippi’s WLBT.

Two days earlier Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS), who McDaniel was challenging, was declared the winner in the runoff election between the two candidates for U.S. Senate in Mississippi.

Hinds County went for Cochran in both the original Republican primary on June 3rd and the runoff. In the runoff, 72 percent voted for Cochran while 28 percent voted for McDaniel. Staffers say they are looking for voters who voted in the Democratic primary on June 3 and the Republican runoff on June 24, which is illegal under state law.

The Hinds County courthouse, it should be noted, was the courthouse where a McDaniel staffer and two supporters found themselves locked inside after they went there after the courthouse had been locked to monitor ballot counting on June 3rd. The courthouse is where the ballots are kept.

McDaniel, on Tuesday, refused to concede the race because, he told radio host Mark Levin, a number of Cochran voters in the runoff broke the law by voting for Cochran when they plan to vote for a Democrat in the general election. That claim is a reference to a Mississippi law that said a voter can only vote in a primary if the voter plans to support the primary’s nominee in the general election. But that law was ruled unenforceable in 2008 by a federal appeals court.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly.
    Proverbs 26:11

  2. Just more teabagger nonsense. When will states and the Fed stop spending taxpayer money to coddle these jerks?

  3. If the McDaniel supporters find any evidence of voting irregularities, the Cochran camp should allege that the evidence was planted by the McDaniel people during the midnight caper on June 3.

    This is just so much fun.

  4. Kinda unusual for campaign staffers to spend the night in a courthouse not messing with ballots at all trust me it was innocent…

    Black people have been voting for decades- women too now.

    28% is a pretty low number, isn’t it? Half your people left? Is that unusual?

    The RNC has proven by experiment that Republicans campaign dishonestly, commit vote fraud with gusto, and try to restrict ‘groups’ from voting. Just eat poop and get on with your pathetic life.

  5. Avatar for dnl dnl says:

    The TeaPotty skulkers in the court house must have screwed up…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

26 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for ajm Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for meri Avatar for agio Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for ecmiles Avatar for tallyjohnson Avatar for learning Avatar for jtgeomom Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for monsterthews Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for dnl Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for ryokyo Avatar for sjk Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for gardenseed

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: