Chaos Erupts At 1st Charlottesville City Council Meeting Since Car Attack (VIDEO)

Emotions run high during the Charlottesville City Council meeting Monday night in Charlottesville, Va. Photo/Andrew Shurtleff/The Daily Progress
Protesters yell during the Charlottesville City Council meeting Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, in Charlottesville, Va. Anger boiled over at the first Charlottesville City Council meeting since a white nationalist rally in th... Protesters yell during the Charlottesville City Council meeting Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, in Charlottesville, Va. Anger boiled over at the first Charlottesville City Council meeting since a white nationalist rally in the city descended into violent chaos, with some residents screaming and cursing at councilors Monday night and calling for their resignations. (Andrew Shurtleff/The Daily Progress via AP) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The first Charlottesville, Virginia city council meeting since the deadly attack on counter-protesters at a white nationalist rally in the city erupted on Monday night when several residents began shouting down city council members.

Residents attending the meeting took the council members to task for the way the city handled the rally of white nationalists earlier this month.

“You had multiple opportunities to intervene and you did not intervene one time.  We told you exactly what you needed to do and you did nothing,” one man said at the meeting, according to local NBC affiliate WVIR.

At one point during the meeting, two people climbed onto the dais to hold a large sign reading, “Blood on your hands,” prompting some councilors and city staff to flee the room, per WVIR.

As the meeting became increasingly unruly, police intervened and arrested removed individuals, according to the New York Times. When the police detained three people, the crowd in the room broke out into chants of “Shame” and “Shut it down,” per the Times.

At that point, the only city official left in the room was Vice Mayor Wes Bellamy, who negotiated with the angry crowd, the Times reported. He worked out with residents that each would be allowed a turn to speak during the meeting.

Residents in attendance blasted the city for allowing the “Unite the Right” rally to take place and called for the resignation of Mayor Mike Signer, chanting “Signer must go!” They also urged the council to push for the removal of Confederate monuments from the city.

After residents were finished speaking, the city council moved to start the process of removing Confederate statues from the city. The council approved a motion to drape those statues in black fabric to commemorate the victims of the attack, according to WVIR.

Latest Livewire
81
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Vice Mayor Wes Bellamy, who negotiated with the angry crowd, the Times reported. He worked out with residents that each would be allowed a turn to speak during the meeting.

    Good for him.

  2. "Residents in attendance blasted the city for allowing the “Unite the Right” rally to take place and called for the resignation of Mayor Mike Signer, chanting “Signer must go!” "

    Wasn’t the city under a court order to let the rally go on as initially planned after they tried to move it to a larger venue where crowd control would be easier?

  3. Yeah, it would have been pretty bad if the whole council had walked out. Rightly or wrongly - and it sounds like rightly from what I´ve read - the city and the police did not do enough to prevent violence from the right-wingers. There needs to be some accountability for that failure.

    I do have sympathy for the city as far as allowing the march in the first place. It was protected speech, after all, and there was a court ruling to that effect.

  4. Residents in attendance blasted the city for allowing the “Unite the Right” rally to take place and called for the resignation of Mayor Mike Signer, chanting “Signer must go!”

    The various supremacy groups are obviously repugnant. I'd be curious when applying for a permit whether you are actually required to inform the city how your demonstration will unfold, what will be said or shouted, who the targets of your ire or protest are. That smacks of prior restraint if the permit process is too intrusive. Claiming fears of incitement in wanting a group forbidden a permit is weak tea, since it's your choice to ignore them or not even attend or observe their rally.
    I don't like Nazis and white supremacists, but I question the logistics and propriety of denying them their 1st Amendment rights.
    Would we be OK with a town almost entirely dependent on the coal industry refusing a climate change group the right to gather and march? Should Reno, NV tell 1000 people from an anti-gambling society they're not welcome to voice their opinions as a group within city limits? Where do we draw lines when Constitutional rights are involved?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

75 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for hoppy Avatar for jjwhack Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for irasdad Avatar for wanderer Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for sniffit Avatar for yskov Avatar for arrendis Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for herringbone Avatar for dddinah Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for georgeh Avatar for woland66 Avatar for socalista Avatar for clare Avatar for phillip Avatar for dougsanders

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: