Lobbyist For Arizona’s Anti-Gay Bill Revels In Hobby Lobby Ruling

FILE-Cathi Herrod, president of the Center For Arizona Policy, speaks during an Arizona state House of Representatives hearing at the Arizona Capitol, in Phoenix, in this June 10, 2013. Arizona's Republican Gov. Jan ... FILE-Cathi Herrod, president of the Center For Arizona Policy, speaks during an Arizona state House of Representatives hearing at the Arizona Capitol, in Phoenix, in this June 10, 2013. Arizona's Republican Gov. Jan Brewer faced intensifying pressure Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2014, from CEOs, politicians in Washington and state lawmakers in her own party to veto a bill supported by Herrod's group that would allow business owners with strongly held religious beliefs to deny service to gays and lesbians. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The president of the conservative group that pushed Arizona’s anti-gay “religious freedom” bill earlier this year took Hobby Lobby’s victory Monday at the Supreme Court as a vindication of sorts for that since-vetoed legislation.

“This decision underscores the purpose of Arizona’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act – to balance a compelling governmental interest with every American’s freedom to live and work according to their faith,” Cathi Herrod, president of the Center for Arizona Policy, said in a statement. “The Court’s ruling exemplifies how the CAP-supported SB 1062 would have protected individual liberty, while protecting against unlawful abuse of religious freedom.”

“Like the proposed SB 1062 would have affirmed,” Herrod continued, “the Supreme Court said today that no one should be forced to surrender their First Amendment religious freedom protections merely because they start a business.”

Herrod’s group was the major force behind the legislation, even reportedly meeting with aides to Gov. Jan Brewer (R) to help refine the bill’s language. Brewer vetoed the bill in February after widespread outcry that it would enable businesses to discriminate against LGBT people.

Herrod also hinted at more to come. Some law experts said Monday that they expect groups that have pushed bills like Arizona’s will see the Supreme Court’s ruling as an opening to reopen that effort.

“This is a decisive victory for religious freedom. Center for Arizona Policy is committed to carrying on our passionate defense of religious liberty for all,” Herrod said. “We will be analyzing this decision to determine what else can be done to strengthen religious freedom protections in Arizona.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Well, that didn’t take long. So much for the “narrowly focused” bullshit. Which state will be first in passing a religious “exemption” against LGBTs?

  2. “the Supreme Court said today that no one should be forced to surrender their First Amendment religious freedom protections merely because they start a business.”

    how about adding, or get a job.

  3. Yeppers. That slippery slope just goes straight down into Hell itself.

  4. Avatar for lew lew says:

    Huh. Supreme court opens door to religion trumping civil law; religious groups rejoice, new tsunami of lawsuits planned.

    Funny; when did I move to Iraq?

  5. And all those folks pointing out that this ruling is “narrow” and women can still have access via the ACA are going to have egg all over once the repercussions become clear, and thanks to that bigot in Arizona, those repercussions are becoming very clear.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

14 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for doninsd Avatar for ericaz Avatar for lew Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for ctvoter Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for jasper Avatar for fitley Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for DelrayDame Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for sammystone Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for lemmitellya

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: