Report: Border Patrol Was Told To Ignore Lawmakers, Attorneys During Travel Ban

Protesters are surrounded by police officers and travelers as they pass through an exit of Terminal 4 at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, Saturday, Jan. 28, 2017 after earlier in the day two Iraqi refugees were detained while trying to enter the country. On Friday, Jan. 27, President Donald Trump signed an executive order suspending all immigration from countries with terrorism concerns for 90 days. Countries included in the ban are Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen, which are all Muslim-majority nations. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle)
Protesters are surrounded by police officers and travelers as they pass through an exit of Terminal 4 at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, Saturday, Jan. 28, 2017 after earlier in the day two Iraqi r... Protesters are surrounded by police officers and travelers as they pass through an exit of Terminal 4 at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, Saturday, Jan. 28, 2017 after earlier in the day two Iraqi refugees were detained while trying to enter the country. On Friday, Jan. 27, President Donald Trump signed an executive order suspending all immigration from countries with terrorism concerns for 90 days. Countries included in the ban are Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen, which are all Muslim-majority nations. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

During the first days of President Donald Trump’s travel ban on people from several majority-Muslim countries, as airports were besieged by chaos and protests, immigration officials were told to ignore inquiries from members of Congress, attorneys and the press, the Daily Beast reported Thursday.

According to an email obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by the Daily Beast and the James Madison Project, a Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) official told his employees that they were banned from speaking to members of Congress or the press.

Asked about this strategy, CBP told the Daily Beast that was typical procedure and that all requests from Congress must go through the agency’s Office of Congressional Affairs (OCA).

Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) told the Daily Beast that he did not receive a response from the OCA when he asked about those detained, however.

“They built a stone wall and gave us the middle finger,” he told the publication. “They feel they can do that with impunity because Trump’s in the White House and Sessions is at the Department of Justice, and they can behave outside the law or inside the law as they see fit.”

Another email from a CBP official directed employees to ignore calls from attorneys, claiming that they were likely protesters since they “appear to be reading from a script,” according to the report. The official told employees to direct requests to the agency’s Office of Public Affairs.

“This is most likely a form of telephonic protest to the EO,” the official wrote, per the Daily Beast. “Please advise all your personnel not to engage the callers nor respond to any questions.”

The emails also showed that CBP officials monitored protests at airports and which elected officials made appearances at the protests, per the Daily Beast.

Read the full report here.

 

Latest Livewire
29
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Nice to have this confirmed. Congress should be making these guys’ lives hell (although they won’t).

  2. So much for the law and whistleblower protections. Lemme see, who was in charge of that whole mess? Oh, that’s right…DHS. And who was in charge of enforcement and giving the orders at DHS during the Muslim travel ban? Oh, that’s right…ding, ding, ding…General Kelly, now tRump’s Chief of Staff.

    Oy. This does not instill much confidence.

  3. Avatar for buzz buzz says:

    So people tasked with enforcing the law deliberately proceeded to break the law with impunity.

    Lovely.

  4. Avatar for dweb dweb says:

    And do not forget that somehow, CPB staff magically produced and presented to incoming immigrants, documents they were told they HAD to sign. Those documents, if signed, indicated that the signer waived any right to enter the US now and forever. In numerous cases, the immigrants were denied ANY access to an attorney or even someone who spoke English.

    Where these documents came from has never been determined as far as I know. How they appeared so quickly in the turmoil caused by Trump’s sudden ban is yet another mystery, but clearly at least some Customs personnel were more than ready and eager to take the law into their own hands.

  5. Are we sure Arpaio didn’t get a role in the Misadministration while we weren’t looking?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for jeffgee1 Avatar for marby Avatar for mooster Avatar for dweb Avatar for vonq Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for careysub Avatar for twowolves Avatar for hugopreuss Avatar for mrf Avatar for greycardinal Avatar for buzz Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for matx Avatar for katscherger Avatar for j_publicus Avatar for edys Avatar for coprophagoussmile

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: