Top Trump Surrogate Says Muslim Ban Was ‘Never Directed At Religion’

Donald Trump, left, and Carl Paladino, who ran for governor of New York as a Republican in 2010, speak during a gun rights rally at the Empire State Plaza on Tuesday, April 1, 2014, in Albany, N.Y. Activists are seek... Donald Trump, left, and Carl Paladino, who ran for governor of New York as a Republican in 2010, speak during a gun rights rally at the Empire State Plaza on Tuesday, April 1, 2014, in Albany, N.Y. Activists are seeking a repeal of a 2013 state law that outlawed the sales of some popular guns like the AR-15. The law championed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo has been criticized as unconstitutional by some gun rights activists. (AP Photo/Mike Groll) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Yet another top surrogate for Donald Trump has come forward to say that the presumptive GOP nominee’s proposal to ban Muslim immigration to the U.S. had nothing to do with faith.

“I don’t think it was ever a ban directed at religion,” Carl Paladino, the former New York GOP gubernatorial nominee, told the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday.

“Expecting a clear definition is a little bit much in the middle of a presidential campaign,” he added as a disclaimer.

Trump’s initial proposal explicitly targeted followers of Islam. In December, he called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

Though Trump has since announced several modifications, most recently that only immigrants from “terrorist countries” would be barred entry, he has not been shy about expressly calling to keep Muslims out.

Trump’s supporters and staffers have struggled with messaging on the ban, often contradicting each other and the candidate himself.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said last week that the ban was not “and never has been” directed towards Muslims. But Trump’s national spokeswoman, Katrina Pierson, said Monday that the new call to only ban immigrants from countries with a history of terrorist attacks was a mere “refining” rather than a substantive shift.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. It was directed at skin color.

  2. There simply are not enough faces nor palms to respond to this adequately.

  3. Honestly, I was holding it for a friend.

  4. Avatar for korvu korvu says:

    Batman Returns

  5. The Müesli ban??? Why it’s always been about hot cereal…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

38 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for chammy Avatar for trippin Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for inversion Avatar for mantan Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for downriver Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for dnl Avatar for pshah Avatar for wagonmound Avatar for beattycat Avatar for mordant_k Avatar for clauscph Avatar for edhedh Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for canyoncountry

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: