You've read 7 articles this month

TPM is funded overwhelmingly by readers’ membership fees. More than 91% of our revenue is derived from memberships and reader contributions. The rest comes from advertising. As a fully independent organization, TPM has no corporate overlords. TPM is not beholden to or controlled by any outside interests. TPM was founded by a journalist and to this day its “business” side is staffed with former journalists whose primary mission is to create a sustainable environment for our reporters and editors to do great work.

Want better media? Support a better media company

  • Reader-funded
  • Unionized
  • Mission-driven

WSJ Editor Stokes Feud With Op-Ed Eviscerating Fox ‘Huckster’ Sean Hannity

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

After earning Fox News talking head Sean Hannity’s ire last week for calling him the “dumbest anchor” on the network, Wall Street Journal editor Bret Stephens slammed Hannity in a Monday column for parroting Donald Trump’s suggestion that the election will be “rigged.”

Calling the conservative commentator one of Trump’s “media munchkins” who has barely concealed his love for the businessman, Stephens called out Hannity for his recent on-air “rationalizations” in which he names-and-shames the “Establishment Republican types” he’ll blame if Trump loses in November.

While Trump has recently begun testing out the “rigged” election conspiracy theory to explain away a potential loss, Stephens wrote, “Hannity’s excuses are even more disgraceful, combining oily self-absolution with venomous obloquy for the very conservatives who have spent the year warning that a Trump candidacy is an epic GOP disaster.”

“The habit of shifting blame and refusing to take responsibility is supposed to be the curse of the underclass and its political hucksters, but Mr. Hannity is giving Al Sharpton a run for his money,” he wrote.

If Trump loses to Hillary Clinton by a wide margin, as in George McGovern’s doomed 1972 run, the WSJ opinion editor argued it will be difficult for Trump’s allies to sustain charges that they were betrayed, except among the “most cretinous” like Hannity.

The columnist also addressed Hannity’s Twitter rant, where he called Stephens a “dumbass,” over the “dumbest anchor” tweet. The anchor “can’t even swear competently,” Stephens wrote.

For now, Hannity hasn’t responded to Stephens’ latest shots fired. But if history is any guide, he likely won’t stay silent for long.

Latest Livewire
139
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Let’s you and him fight!

    I’ll buy the popcorn.

  2. Well if you needed any proof at all that the Trumpster represents his base, look no further…

  3. Yes. Yesssss. Feed on each other. See what the last 30 years of GOP fearmongering and obstructionism have wrought. Tremble before the realization that you have created a hungry beast. And then let it feed.

  4. venomous obloquy

    I like this guy…

  5. Hey Sean, he insulted you ! You are not going to accept that,right ?

    I think Seans days at Fox are numbered, Ailes termination agreement prohibits him from hiring Fox Employees for some time, what will poor Sean do now ?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

133 more replies

Participants

Avatar for alliebean Avatar for sysprog Avatar for populistesq Avatar for krusher Avatar for sconosciuto Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for irasdad Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for cliffhendroval Avatar for mantan Avatar for psyclone Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for quaker_in_a_basement Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for jcblues Avatar for tena Avatar for gibbous Avatar for clauscph Avatar for edhedh Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for pike_bishop

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: