Boston Globe Calls For Reinstating Assault Weapons Ban After Orlando

A variety of military-style semiautomatic rifles obtained during a buy back program are displayed at Los Angeles police headquarters on Thursday, Dec. 27,2012. Similar weapons have been used in at least four high-pro... A variety of military-style semiautomatic rifles obtained during a buy back program are displayed at Los Angeles police headquarters on Thursday, Dec. 27,2012. Similar weapons have been used in at least four high-profile shootings in the past year, including most recently the Connecticut school shootings and the Christmas Eve killings of two New York firefighters. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Boston Globe on Thursday published an interactive op-ed calling for Congress to reinstate a ban on assault weapons, drawing attention to the hundreds killed in mass shootings since the federal ban expired in 2004.

“There is nothing more American today than a mass shooting, the quickest way for the wicked among us to join the ranks of the reviled,” the newspaper’s editors wrote. “Their motives are many, but their opportunity is limited only by their gun and ammunition magazine brand preference. In this country, the federal government limits duck hunters to weapons that carry only three shells, to protect the duck population. But you can buy an assault weapon in seven minutes and an unlimited number of bullets to fire with it.”

This past weekend, Omar Mateen allegedly killed 49 people and injured 53 more using an AR-15-style rifle, the Sig Sauer MCX, in what was the worst mass shooting in U.S. history.

Pointing out that there have been 47 mass shootings since the assault weapons ban expired, resulting in 411 deaths, the Globe editors argued a “sensible, mature society” should be able to recognize that these firearms play a central role in our national gun death epidemic.

The newspaper rolled out interactive features to highlight the point, including a web video showing what it’s like to be shot by a rifle, whose bullets travel twice as fast as those of a pistol, and a feature to email or tweet congressional representatives who have stood in the way of changing the gun control debate.

On Twitter, the Globe posted the names, ages, and date and location of death for all 411 victims of mass shootings since 2004, along with the hashtag #MakeItStop.

“The idea of restricting unfettered access to assault weapons is only considered radical when it comes out of the mouth of a modern US president,” the editors concluded in their op-ed. “To most Americans, and every other democracy on the planet, it is rightly considered common sense.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) voiced her support for the Globe’s push on Twitter.

Latest Livewire
10
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Pointing out that there have been 47 mass shootings since the assault weapons ban expired, resulting in 411 deaths, the Globe editors argued ***a “sensible, mature society” should be able to recognize that these firearms play a central role i***n our national gun death epidemic.

    Well, there you go, the thrust of their argument undermined by their very own observations.
  2. Nonsense. Your argument appears to be if gun deaths are the product of so many things we should not do one thing that will reduce gun deaths. If your argument is that we should do everything in addition to banning the AR-15 (for civilians) to reduce gun deaths than I agree.

    The best way to get the scientific research we need to find solutions that reduce the carnage is for Congress to establish a national gun safety agency along the lines of the national highway agency that researched vehicular carnage and helped reduce auto deaths by over 40% since 1970 even though Americans drive three times as many miles now as then.

    Until we break the power of the NRA over Congress, nothing will change.

  3. I once asked an NRA member if they sold a special cleaner that got all the blood off their hands and left them shiny smooth. His face got beet red and he called me a commie while trying to punch me out.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOOTKA0aGI0
  4. “The idea of restricting unfettered access to assault weapons is only considered radical when it comes out of the mouth of a modern US president,” the editors concluded in their op-ed. “To most Americans, and every other democracy on the planet, it is rightly considered common sense.”

    Even the gun nuts understand it is common sense. That is why they run out and buy these guns after mass murders. They know a sensible response is to ban these weapons.

  5. If that was to Stevie, I think he was ripping on the presumption that we’re at all a ‘sensible, mature society’.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for agio Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for arrendis Avatar for exspectator

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: