Dem Rep Says Rarely Invoked Law Could Make Trump Release Taxes

FILE - In this June 16, 2015 file photo, Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., accompanied by fellow House Democrats, gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. Pascrell says a man who gunned down a secu... FILE - In this June 16, 2015 file photo, Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., accompanied by fellow House Democrats, gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. Pascrell says a man who gunned down a security guard at a federal building in Manhattan before killing himself was a whistleblower who had been given "a raw deal" by the agency that fired him. Pascrell said Saturday, Aug. 22 that several members of his staff worked with gunman Kevin Downing to resolve his case and Downing never showed any violent tendencies. Pascrell says he has no idea why Downing snapped. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) said in an interview published Saturday that a 1924 law could be invoked to examine President Donald Trump’s tax returns for possible violations and conflicts of interest.

Pascrell, a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, asked the committee’s chairman Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) to order the Treasury Department to provide President Donald Trump’s tax returns to the committee, according to a statement released by Pascrell’s office on Feb. 1.

“The Presidential campaign is over and the fear that a political opponent will try to use tax returns for electoral benefit is passed,” Pascrell wrote. “President Trump is now governing while also owning a business with international investments. The Constitution faces unprecedented threats due to this arrangement.”

He is seeking the last 10 years of Trump’s taxes, according to the statement, and requested a response from Brady by Wednesday.

After private examination of Trump’s taxes the committee could share them with the full chamber, which would in effect make them public, according to a report by USA Today.

Brady’s office did not respond to USA Today’s request for comment Friday.

“This isn’t for the Democrats or the Republicans, and it’s not to embarrass anybody,” Pascrell said as quoted in the report. “This is to make sure the American people know the facts, and if there are conflicts, they need to be resolved.”

He said that many congressmen “are absolutely intimidated by this president” but that he has no plans to drop the subject.

“If I get a ‘no’ answer on this, I’ll be very honest with you: If these guys think I’m walking away from this, they’re absolutely nuts,” Pascrell said. “The calls we’re getting, the calls other congressmen are getting, it’s unbelievable, we never expected this.”

Throughout his campaign, Trump claimed that he could not release his tax returns due to an ongoing audit.

In September 2016, however, Trump admitted that he could in fact make the returns public at any time but implied that he saw no political advantage to doing so.

Senior Trump advisor Kellyanne Conway said in January that the President will not release his tax returns.

“We litigated this all through the election,” she said. “People didn’t care.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jep07 jep07 says:

    Is Trump so buried in scandal and lies, he simply can never be considered legitimate? Just WHAT is hiding in those taxes that he is so desperate to cover up?

    The question still lingers, is he really a legitimate President?

    I QUESTION IT SERIOUSLY AND SO DO MANY REAL EXPERTS.

    His grossly inadequate understanding of our constitution and its three-branch constraints SIMPLY DISQUALIFIES TRUMP AS ANYTHING AKIN TO “LEGITIMATE.”.

    Trump quite certainly thought he was being elected dictator, he is simple minded that way. AND NOW HE “RULES BY DECREE”, there are no laws he can sign, BECAUSE REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS ARE STUCK SCRAMBLING TO COVER THEIR LYING ASSES OVER THE OBAMACARE SCARE THEY CREATED,

    Which only reinforces Trump’s dictatorial delusions.

    It has come down to a reckoning over the Obamacare/ACA deception perpetrated by Republicans on ignorant voters since 2009. Their lie is collapsing even as they think it has come to fruition.

    In their deception-fueled rise to false majority, they confused their own voters, creating an Obamacare boogeyman that masked the real ACA, and they led with that deception at every juncture. Now those voters are figuring out, as their healthcare is threatened and they discover their beloved ACA, that protects them from pain and suffering, and the evil Obamacare, that they were brainwashed to hate for any reason but the truth, ARE THE SAME THING!

    Anyone who thinks that is silly doesn’t know these people.

    They believed what FOX and Rush et al told them about “evil Obamacare” despite their own personal experience with the ACA. Sounds ridiculous, but it is unfortunately very true.

    It didn’t happen in a vacuum. It required a complicit oldstream media and a list of common lies stacked up endlessly to maintain the ruse, but it simply could not be sustained after Trump was so unduly elected and the harsh reality sunk in.

    But now that people are actually LOSING those benefits, they have made the logic leap. They are waking from their stupor. Something moves them to sanity.

    Pain can do that. They are going to be very angry when the implications of their foolishness and the deception that spawned it come to light in the chaos of Trump’s absurd administration.

    They aren’t just mad their healthcare is going away, they are angry they were fooled like fools.

    Discovering Obamacare and the ACA are one and the same thing must have hurt, physically. These low-information reactionary voters are beginning to realize in the hardest way that Trump used them like a cheap trick to get elected, then went to DC and started dismantling their hard-won healthcare.

    Call it Obamacare all they want, it is the ACA they want to dismantle, and The People they deceived are getting wise to their lies.

  2. “…A 1924 law…”. What law?

  3. The problem here is Trump doesn’t care about laws but he will use the “law”.
    He’s above the law…he thinks.
    His usual strategy here would be to threaten, then go to court and string out the other party until they run out of money to litigate. He’s done that hundreds of times.
    But now he’s up against an outfit that can print all the cash they need.
    edit
    trump’s diversionary shiny object today is the following tweet:

    Donald J. Trump
    ‏@realDonaldTrump

    58m58 minutes ago
    I know Mark Cuban well. He backed me big-time but I wasn’t interested in taking all of his calls.He’s not smart enough to run for president!

  4. Avatar for jep07 jep07 says:

    “This isn’t for the Democrats or the Republicans, and it’s not to embarrass anybody,"

    there’s the problem… until they are embarrassed they just don’t care.

  5. Is it this law? This is the CFR cited in Rep. Pascrell’s statement.

    26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103

    Edit. This is the section of interest

    (f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
    (1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
    Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
    (2) Chief of Staff of Joint Committee on Taxation
    Upon written request by the Chief of Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish him with any return or return information specified in such request. Such Chief of Staff may submit such return or return information to any committee described in paragraph (1), except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
    (3) Other committees
    Pursuant to an action by, and upon written request by the chairman of, a committee of the Senate or the House of Representatives (other than a committee specified in paragraph (1)) specially authorized to inspect any return or return information by a resolution of the Senate or the House of Representatives or, in the case of a joint committee (other than the joint committee specified in paragraph (1)) by concurrent resolution, the Secretary shall furnish such committee, or a duly authorized and designated subcommittee thereof, sitting in closed executive session, with any return or return information which such resolution authorizes the committee or subcommittee to inspect. Any resolution described in this paragraph shall specify the purpose for which the return or return information is to be furnished and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained from any other source.
    (4) Agents of committees and submission of information to Senate or House of Representatives
    (A) Committees described in paragraph (1)
    Any committee described in paragraph (1) or the Chief of Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation shall have the authority, acting directly, or by or through such examiners or agents as the chairman of such committee or such chief of staff may designate or appoint, to inspect returns and return information at such time and in such manner as may be determined by such chairman or chief of staff. Any return or return information obtained by or on behalf of such committee pursuant to the provisions of this subsection may be submitted by the committee to the Senate or the House of Representatives, or to both. The Joint Committee on Taxation may also submit such return or return information to any other committee described in paragraph (1), except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
    (B) Other committees
    Any committee or subcommittee described in paragraph (3) shall have the right, acting directly, or by or through no more than four examiners or agents, designated or appointed in writing in equal numbers by the chairman and ranking minority member of such committee or subcommittee, to inspect returns and return information at such time and in such manner as may be determined by such chairman and ranking minority member. Any return or return information obtained by or on behalf of such committee or subcommittee pursuant to the provisions of this subsection may be submitted by the committee to the Senate or the House of Representatives, or to both, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer, shall be furnished to the Senate or the House of Representatives only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
    (5) Disclosure by whistleblower
    Any person who otherwise has or had access to any return or return information under this section may disclose such return or return information to a committee referred to in paragraph (1) or any individual authorized to receive or inspect information under paragraph (4)(A) if such person believes such return or return information may relate to possible misconduct, maladministration, or taxpayer abuse.

    Coz I’m terrible at interpreting this stuff and am not sure how it applies. Someone, please enlighten a poor legalilliterate.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

192 more replies

Participants

Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for rxbusa Avatar for ghost Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for charliee Avatar for jep07 Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for martinstett Avatar for nemo Avatar for esva Avatar for uk_observer Avatar for dickweed Avatar for bardi Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for tena Avatar for nishna Avatar for jtx Avatar for timbo Avatar for circusmax Avatar for krux Avatar for bobef

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: