Preet Bharara: Trump Lawyer Has A History Of ‘Ludicrous’ Assertions

Preet Bharara Preet Bharara at the Oxford Union, UK - 29 May 2017 (Rex Features via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, on Monday disputed a claim by a lawyer for President Donald Trump that the President “cannot obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer.”

“I have a lot of experience with John Dowd,” Bharara said in an interview with NPR’s Steve Inskeep, referring to Trump’s lawyer. “He represented some high profile people in cases before my office. And he said then, as he’s saying now, a lot of incorrect, mistaken and, on occasion, ludicrous things, so I don’t put a lot of stock in it.”

“The mere fact that the President is the President doesn’t immunize him from an accusation of obstruction,” Bharara added.

Trump fired Bharara in March after he refused to step down at the President’s request. Trump had originally promised Bharara that he would keep his job as U.S. attorney.

Dowd on Sunday claimed responsibility for drafting a tweet sent from Trump’s Twitter account in which Trump claimed to have fired former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn “because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI.”

The President hadn’t previously claimed to know that Flynn had lied to the FBI prior to his firing. Bharara explained the significance of the tweet.

“It matters because it’s a change from what the reasoning was that was given by the President in the first place,” he said. “A few days after [Flynn] became the national security adviser, the President said only that he’d fired Michael Flynn because he had lied to the vice president.”

“And now you have the interjection of a new reason, apparently, which was that he knew, the President knew, that there was a lie to the FBI, which then suggests, that if he did that and knew that before he asked Jim Comey, the FBI director, to back off the investigation— That shows a level of knowledge and intent that was previously unknown,” he said.

Obstruction of justice, Bharara added, is “clearly one of the things that’s being looked at by special counsel Mueller and his team.”

Latest Livewire
73
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for daled daled says:

    Haven’t we been told by the White House that if it comes on Trump’s twitter feed it comes FROM Trump? So, a) nobody believes anyone other than Trump writes and posts his tweets, and b) Trump’s personal lawyer needs to brush up on his Constitutional knowledge AND the Articles of Impeachment drawn up against Nixon (as many others have said in other threads).

  2. I can’t be the first person to suggest that Dowd could be guilty of obstruction if lied and Trump did author the ‘fired Flynn’ tweet? Certainly if Dowd makes such a false statement to the FBI.

  3. Avatar for sooner sooner says:

    tRump organization Rule #5.

    “All tRump lawyers must use either my doctor or Putin’s Rasputin for all health matters”

    Only he can make you hole again.

    <img
  4. I remember all those lifetimes ago when Michael Cohen said you can’t rape your wife and the entire legal community in the nation slapped its collective head in disbelief at how stupid one of their own could publicly be. One of the early-on hints at the kind of person Trump likes to be surrounded with.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

67 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for headhunter212 Avatar for cervantes Avatar for pshaw Avatar for inversion Avatar for gr Avatar for ottnott Avatar for dannyeastvillage Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for darrtown Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for rickjones Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for milt69 Avatar for afriedma Avatar for mcgarry64 Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for djhj Avatar for aiddon Avatar for karlwlewis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: