Critics Pile On After Politico Changes Its Ben Carson West Point Story

Ben Carson CNBC Republican Presidential Debate, Boulder, America - 28 Oct 2015 (Rex Features via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

UPDATED: Nov. 6, 2015, 7:23 p.m. ET, to reflect Politico adding an editor’s note.

DC media watchers and conservatives piled onto Politico on Friday afternoon after the news outlet edited its explosive scoop about Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson having claimed to have been offered a “full scholarship” to West Point when he was younger.

The original story, published shortly before noon ET on Friday, ran with the headline “Ben Carson admits fabricating West Point scholarship scholarship.”

The lead-off paragraph of the article said Carson’s campaign “admitted…his application and acceptance” to the prestigious U.S. Military Academy at West Point was “fabricated.”

Hours later, Politico changed the headline and first paragraph. The title was edited to drop the “fabrication” framing, instead touting it as an “exclusive.”

As of 5 p.m. ET Friday, the headline read:

No editor’s note or correction originally accompanied the changes, further fueling critics accusing the publication of making stealth corrections, after they were first published.

A lengthy editor’s note was later added detailing the changes.

“Carson never explicitly wrote that he had applied for admission to West Point, although that was the clear implication of his claim to have received an offer of a ‘full scholarship,’ a point that POLITICO’s initial report should have made clear,” Politico said in the note.

Politico stood by the story. Spokesperson Lauren Edmonds sent a statement to TPM on Friday evening:

“We continue to stand by the story. We updated it to reflect Ben Carson’s on the record response to the New York Times and other new details, which underscore the validity of our original reporting.”

Here’s a small sampling of the criticism Politico received:

After the original article came out, the Carson campaign went on the offensive – insisting the candidate never applied after weighing his options – as questions were raised about whether the retired neurosurgeon’s “full scholarship” was evidence he applied to the school.

Carson told the New York Times the scholarship offer came in an “informal” meeting, where he was told his stellar academic record could “easily get [him] a scholarship to West Point.”

A spokesman for the campaign later called the story “an outright lie.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. So Politico couldn’t include the entry in his book?

    Wouldn’t that have, at least, give some credence to its “reporting”?

  2. So Carson only lied a little bit?

    Now, that’s a relief!

  3. Josh has tried to help dig himself out of this mess as well. But either someone offered to sponsor his application (which means a member of Congress) or they didn’t. Westmoreland is dead, as likely is everyone else aged 40 or older at that time who was there, so it’s unlikely there is anyone left to corroborate or counter his claim.

  4. That anyone would think Politico is part of the “liberal media” is a joke. And that Politico thought it could somehow retain the love of the right-wing nuts who won’t accept anything except Fox or talk radio as legitimate is pathetic.

  5. Ann Coulter is certainly outraged at cyber-rag Politico:

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

156 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for leftflank Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for cessnadriver Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for sandyh Avatar for mantan Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for ottnott Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for beattycat Avatar for eatbees Avatar for clauscph Avatar for bplewis24 Avatar for Landshark2995

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: