GOP Senator Demands Democrat Pull Ad That Shows Them Smiling Together

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) wants her Democratic Senate colleague Mark Begich (D-AK) to withdraw a television ad that shows the pair smiling together and talks up their aligned voting records, The Hill reported Thursday.

But Begich won’t do it, according to MSNBC’s Kasie Hunt.

According to The Hill, Murkowski’s lawyers sent a cease-and-desist letter Thursday to Begich, demanding the ad be taken down. The ad, called “Great Team,” shows an image of Begich and Murkowski smiling side by side, and the narrator says that the two vote together “as much as 80 percent of the time.”

“This advertisement is factually incorrect,” Murkowski’s lawyers wrote in the letter. “It also misuses Senator Murkowski’s image, and implies her support, without her permission — and, in fact, over her known objections.”

According to Hunt, Begich said that the image is an Associated Press photograph and the ad doesn’t violate Senate ethics rules or federal law.

Murkowski also complained to reporters last month that Begich had been talking up their alleged alliance.

“I just think he needs to run on his record — and not mine,” she told Politico. Begich disagreed at the time.

“The record speaks for itself,” he told Politico. “The votes that we have been taking are showing clearly that we’re one of the few delegations in this whole chaotic dysfunctional Washington, D.C., that actually vote together more often than anyone. That’s a fact.”

Latest Livewire
34
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Why is she all butthurt over that? I don’t get Republicans.

  2. Republicans never want to be seen smiling.

  3. OMG WORKING TOGETHER IS AWFUL!!!

    //////ohnoes

  4. Because working with Democrats is collaboration with evil. As is, for that matter, educating yourself about the issues of the day, believing that “public policy” isn’t a synonym for “tyranny,” offering lese magiste to Rush Limbaugh, and any number of other offenses. More kinds of treason to the Republican Party (whose nominee she was not, oddly enough) than there were to the King in Tudor England.

  5. Well, not unless they’re witnessing, perpetrating or contemplating the gratuitous infliction of suffering on animals, poor people or foreigners. Then its mandatory.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

28 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for booch221 Avatar for sabatia Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for Patriott Avatar for deckbose Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for sandyh Avatar for poorcitizen Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for mantan Avatar for dd40 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for gmccpa Avatar for jafafahots Avatar for jrfunkenstein Avatar for kitty Avatar for jrconner Avatar for darrtown Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for thunderclapnewman

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: