Prison Chief: Parts Of Arizona’s Botched Execution Went ‘Perfectly’

Arizona Department of Corrections Director Charles Ryan listens to Odie Washington, senior vice president of corrections for Management and Training Corp., during a news conference regarding the changes Washington's ... Arizona Department of Corrections Director Charles Ryan listens to Odie Washington, senior vice president of corrections for Management and Training Corp., during a news conference regarding the changes Washington's firm is making and circumstances that lead to an escape of three inmates at a state prison run by the private firm in Kingman, Ariz., Thursday, Aug. 19, 2010, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Arizona’s prisons chief said Thursday that parts of Wednesday’s execution went “perfectly,” asserting that the lethal injection procedure shouldn’t be characterized as “botched.”

Department of Corrections Director Charles Ryan said in a statement that IV lines were “perfectly placed” in condemned inmate Joseph Rudolph Wood III’s arms. Ryan added that the IV team, which included a licensed medical doctor, verified multiple times that Wood was comatose and not in pain during the procedure.

Wood lay dying for nearly two hours in what his lawyers said should have been a 10-minute procedure. The lawyers also said Wood was “gasping and snorting for more than an hour” during the execution.

But Ryan said that so far there was no evidence to support the “premature and erroneous conclusion” that the execution had been botched.

“Media reports, some of which were made prior to any information officially being released on the day of the execution, reached the premature and erroneous conclusion that this execution was ‘botched,’” he said in the statement. “This is pure conjecture because there is no medical or forensic evidence to date that supports that conclusion.”

Ryan said he was committed to fulfilling Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R) request to carry out a thorough and transparent review of Wood’s execution, and the state would not seek any further warrants of execution until the review was completed.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. “Perfectly placed” needles, huh? That’s like saying MH17 had a fabulous in-flight movie.

  2. There are people often found in positions of authority who are so arrogant, so convinced they could never do or be responsible for anything unfantastic, that they can’t acknowledge reality when something has obviously gone very wrong. They’re effectively mentally ill.

  3. Parts of Arizona’s Botched Execution Went ‘Perfectly’

    Particularly the part where the guy was pronounced dead.

  4. A killer is dead. That’s pretty much what most people really care about.
    The truth of the matter is they don’t care that it was humane or inhumane. The only thing that matters is the inmate “got what was coming to him”. If he died in pain, that is even better.

    Particularly in Arizona. Why do you think Sheriff Joe is so popular here? Because people think he’s seen to be so tough on inmates, making them wear pink uniforms and eat green balogna.

    I don’t think much will really change after this.

  5. Avatar for lew lew says:

    Again, another walking, talking example of the current GOTP: Always wrong, but never uncertain.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

34 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for webcelt Avatar for charliee Avatar for fredb Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for micaiah Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for krusher Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for mantan Avatar for yskov Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for alyoshakaramazov Avatar for bostonianinbrooklyn Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for azsavage Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for joe3033 Avatar for underdog Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for COUNTMEIN

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: