Scalia Slams ‘Extreme’ SCOTUS Same-Sex Marriage Ruling

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia addresses an audience at Rhodes College, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2015 in Memphis, Tenn. Justice Scalia's 2015 Constitution Day lecture is called "Constitutional Interpretation." (... U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia addresses an audience at Rhodes College, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2015 in Memphis, Tenn. Justice Scalia's 2015 Constitution Day lecture is called "Constitutional Interpretation." (Yalonda M. James/The Commercial Appeal via AP) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia on Tuesday blasted the court’s June ruling in favor of same-sex marriage, describing the decision as “extreme,” according to the Associated Press.

During a speech at Rhodes College in Tennessee, Scalia said the Supreme Court’s ruling on gay marriage was “the furthest imaginable extension of the Supreme Court doing whatever it wants.”

“Saying that the Constitution requires that practice, which is contrary to the religious beliefs of many of our citizens, I don’t know how you can get more extreme than that,” Scalia said, according to the AP. “I worry about a Court that’s headed in that direction.”

He added that Americans should be concerned that some Supreme Court justices “are making a new Constitution.”

Scalia criticized judges who think of the Constitution as a “living” document.

“They’re not adhering to the text, they’re operating as policy makers,” he said, according to the AP. “They’re not interpreting the constitution. They’re writing one, they’re revising one.”

Justice Scalia wrote the Supreme Court’s dissent to the decision legalizing same-sex marriage, blasting the five majority judges for a “constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine.”

Latest Livewire
51
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “which is contrary to the religious beliefs of many of our citizens”

    So many angles to attack this from…separation of church and state, protecting the minority from the tyranny of the majority, Scalia is an effin idiot

    I don’t know where to begin

  2.  blasting the five majority judges for a "constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine."
    

    Now how would he know about that ? ? — Oh… nevermind —

  3. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    That ruling came from a thorough understanding of the Constitution and how its been interpreted over the last century.

    You’re blathering complaints? They come from a willful inaccurate misrepresenting of the Constitution and how its been interpreted over the last century, and then used to support your anti-constitutional religious doctrine.

    Well, either that, your you’re just a sociopathic dick.

  4. And he can’t articulate any rationale for those statements without using pure applesauce and jiggery-pokery.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

45 more replies

Participants

Avatar for mt_from_cc Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for artemisia Avatar for earlgreyparty Avatar for mcgloinm Avatar for theod Avatar for nineo Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for sniffit Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for johnscotus Avatar for plinx Avatar for pb Avatar for riverstreet Avatar for jcblues Avatar for azjude Avatar for pshah Avatar for ba_al Avatar for unabogie Avatar for mawm Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for stlblue

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: