Reuters: Obama Narrows List To Three For Supreme Court Nomination

Pro-abortion rights protester Lauren Rankin of New York City, left, gets a high five from Sarp Aksel of New York City, as they and anti-abortion protesters, left, rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednes... Pro-abortion rights protester Lauren Rankin of New York City, left, gets a high five from Sarp Aksel of New York City, as they and anti-abortion protesters, left, rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, March 2, 2016. The abortion debate is returning to the Supreme Court in the midst of a raucous presidential campaign and less than three weeks after Justice Antonin Scalia’s death. The justices are taking up the biggest case on the topic in nearly a quarter century and considering whether a Texas law that regulates abortion clinics hampers a woman’s constitutional right to obtain an abortion. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Reuters reported Friday that President Barack Obama has selected three top candidates to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

According to Reuters, Obama is considering Paul Watford, Sri Srinivasan and Merrick Garland.

The Republican leadership in the Senate has already said it will not hold hearings on an Obama pick.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for caltg caltg says:

    The Republican leadership in the Senate has already said it will not hold hearings on an Obama pick

    But of course, once Obama sends his nomination to Capitol Hill, the Repugnant controlled Senate will do their Constitutional duty and undertake the Advise and Consent process. . . .Oh, that’s right,the Constitution does not apply to them. That’s why they are Repugnant.

  2. Hoping for Paul Watford

  3. I thought the two women sounded good, and both had political aspects to their nominations that would have been pretty damning for the Republicans. I wonder how much of the narrowing has to do with what Cornyn and other Republicans have been saying about ruining the nominee’s reputation. Hopefully he picks the nominee soon and then the phase that will really damage the Republicans can begin.

  4. He has quite a resume. And he was unanimously voted in 61-34.

  5. 61-34 doesn’t sound unanimous to me…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

5 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for chammy Avatar for grindelwald Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for drriddle Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for caltg

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: