‘Election Integrity’ Commission Data Request Rejected By One Of Its Own

Secretary of State Connie Lawson speaks to Indiana's eleven representatives of the Electoral College before they formally cast their votes for President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence, Monday,... Secretary of State Connie Lawson speaks to Indiana's eleven representatives of the Electoral College before they formally cast their votes for President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence, Monday, Dec. 19, 2016, in Indianapolis. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The day after the White House’s bogus “election integrity” commission asked states to turn over data from their voter rolls, none other than a Republican secretary of state who was named to the commission itself joined a chorus of states declining to comply with the request.

Several states with Democratic secretaries of state, like California and Kentucky, quickly rejected the ask, decrying it as an attempt to bolster voter suppression attempts. The request came in the form of a letter from Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state notorious for supporting restrictions on voting who is the vice chair of the commission.

But notably, Connie Lawson, Indiana’s Republican secretary of state, also declined to fulfill the request on Friday, citing state law that bars her from sharing voters’ personal information. The commission had requested “publicly-available voter roll data,” but specified that it was interested in information including the last four digits of voters’ social security numbers and birth dates.

Lawson was named to the commission, which is headed up by Vice President Mike Pence, the former governor of Indiana, in May.

Under Lawson, the Indiana State Police raided a voter registration office late last year, and she subsequently removed about half a million names from the voter rolls. As a state senator, Lawson also introduced a voter ID bill.

Latest DC
10
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. So much for State’s Rights. Only when it’s convenient for repubs. The Federal government does not control elections so this “commission” is toothless.

  2. Avatar for caltg caltg says:

    Moreover, Kris Kobach belongs in jail for voter suppression.

  3. The obvious question, to which we all know the answer: How can a federal commission on “Election Integrety” fail to focus on Russian incursions into our most recent election as their first order of business?

    On second thought, it wouldn’t do to give these folks any ideas for more things to screw up.

  4. Not so toothless as you might wish. This commission will produce a report which is likely to be useful in fanning the flames of Les Déplorables. This sort of commission also produces model legislation which can be used to increase voter suppression on a state-by-state basis.

    It could even produce a report that the Dead End Kids at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue could use to impose a unified electoral system (or registration) on us all.

    I’d rather these assholes not have any real voter data.

  5. I want them to go for it.

    The ACLU is likely waiting on that one state to say yes to Kobach.

    That’s when the lawsuits will commence.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for inversion Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for ken_k Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for caltg Avatar for libthinker

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: