As They Admit There’s No Evidence, House Republicans Will Still Greenlight Impeachment Inquiry

This is your TPM evening briefing.
WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 19: Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) departs a meeting with House Republicans at the U.S. Capitol Building on October 19, 2023 in Washington, DC. The Republicans held hours-long meetings to consider emp... WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 19: Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) departs a meeting with House Republicans at the U.S. Capitol Building on October 19, 2023 in Washington, DC. The Republicans held hours-long meetings to consider empowering Speaker Pro Tempore Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) but Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) says he will seek a third vote to become Speaker after failing to get enough support in the first two votes. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

There has been a wave of articles this afternoon surfacing remarks from Republicans, both members of Congress and senators alike, acknowledging publicly that House Republicans’ push for a vote to formally authorize an impeachment inquiry amounts to a political stunt.

The White House even sent out a memo rounding up the various examples of statements today, which included Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) saying, “There’s been no evidence provided to the public yet or certainly to me” to justify an impeachment inquiry, as well as quotes from the very House Republicans who will have to weigh in on the matter as soon as Wednesday.

Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) told reporters “probably not” when asked Tuesday morning whether President Biden had committed high crimes and misdemeanors. Republican Main Street Caucus chair Dusty Johnson (R-SD) told reporters Tuesday, “there’s not evidence to impeach” and that “we have had enough political impeachments in this country.”

Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA) also told reporters, “I don’t think that’s a foregone conclusion,” emphasizing that opening an impeachment inquiry doesn’t mean the House will actually impeach. Rep. Ken Buck, (R-CO) who has spoken out against impeachment from the start, made similar remarks on CNN.

“I’m struggling now, I have to tell you,” he told CNN Monday night. “On one hand I have come out strongly and said there is no direct evidence linking President Biden to the activities of Hunter Biden,” he continued, before explaining that he may feel compelled to support an inquiry vote if it helps enforce House Republican subpoenas.

Other House Republicans who have spoken out about the lack of evidence have taken a similar tone — while they acknowledge they haven’t seen any evidence to justify an impeachment inquiry, they’re still going to authorize it on the House floor.

Newhouse and Johnson reportedly indicated as much in public remarks from the Hill today as well, according to The Messenger.

Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., also said he would support the impeachment inquiry as a “necessary step” and viewed it as a “kind of a formality” to give investigators the strongest tools to conduct the probe. But Newhouse, one of two House Republicans left in Congress who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump for inciting the Jan. 6 insurrection, insisted the opening of an inquiry does not mean the House will eventually vote to impeach Biden.

“House Republicans have been at this for a year and have turned up zero evidence of wrongdoing, because there isn’t any evidence of wrongdoing,” the White House concluded in the memo Tuesday. “Yet they still want to keep their fishing expedition going in order to satisfy their far-right base. They know they don’t have proof against the President, but they’re plowing ahead anyways – showing yet again that this stunt is all politics, no evidence.”

The Best Of TPM Today

In Sentencing Kate Cox To Suffer, The Texas Abortion Ban Is Working Just As Intended

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

One Dem Is Giving House Republicans An Assist In Their Impeachment Subterfuge — Nicole Lafond

What We Are Reading

Losing the Plot: The “Leftists” Who Turn Right — In These Times

Who Would Give This Guy Millions to Build His Own Utopia? — NYT

FBI arrests an ‘internet pornography personality’ on Jan. 6 charges — NBC News

Latest Where Things Stand

Notable Replies

  1. It’s no stunt and the White House clearly knows it: Repugs are desperate to build a counter to the heavy electoral baggage they are carrying, from forced-birthing to Trump and they will dredge, obfuscate, fabricate, lie, slander, and intimidate to forge it; it’s about the narrative.

  2. Members of the Republican party should take heed:

    “If I were two-faced, would I be wearing this one?” ― Abraham Lincoln

  3. Modest proposal: Open up ethics hearings against every single member of Congress. I’m sure they are all fine people, so the hearings will just be exculpatory. We need to make sure we interview all of their former partners, friends, business associates, customers, financial advisors, and of course a full audit of all of their accounting. All of this will reveal how honest Congress is, so it’s really not a witch hunt. We’re just trying to show how great they are, just like the Republicans are trying to exonerate Biden with these investigations.

  4. Avatar for tao tao says:

    They are a bunch of damn liars and are challenging the President to prove it. The man has important things to do, and no time for fools.

  5. Some overreach here.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for ealleniii Avatar for jeffgee1 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for jpc Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for esva Avatar for tao Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for southerndem Avatar for lestat Avatar for noonm Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for 19tibekius6 Avatar for larrykoen Avatar for lanabill Avatar for garrybee Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for dicktater Avatar for mrbill30560 Avatar for old_guru Avatar for coldrent Avatar for bbobby911

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: